[Finale] Why MIDI import is guesswork for notation programs

2005-07-30 Thread Michael Good
Hi Eric, Where is the guess work in MIDI files? If MIDI was good enough for music notation, there would have been no need to invent MusicXML. We invented MusicXML because there was no adequate way to transfer music notation between applications. MIDI's inadequacy for music notation is hardly

Re: [Finale] Why MIDI import is guesswork for notation programs

2005-07-30 Thread David W. Fenton
On 30 Jul 2005 at 16:44, Michael Good wrote: Hi Eric, Where is the guess work in MIDI files? If MIDI was good enough for music notation, there would have been no need to invent MusicXML. We invented MusicXML because there was no adequate way to transfer music notation between

Re: [Finale] Why MIDI import is guesswork for notation programs

2005-07-30 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Thank you! David W. Fenton wrote: I think you're missing the point. The problems Eric was having with MIDI import have *nothing* to do with notational elements that cannot be included in MIDI files. They have everything to do with Finale's obtuse transcription of MIDI data into notation.

Re: [Finale] Why MIDI import is guesswork for notation programs

2005-07-30 Thread Eric Dannewitz
No to be rude, but I really don't care about MusicXML. I'm dealing with MIDI files. The way most professional sequencers (Digital Performer/Protools/Logic) can shuttle things back and forth. I don't see studio's MusicXML to get stuff out of Digital Performer into Sibelius or Finale. All