I am especially intrigued by part of Mr. Patterson's post of today:
"The only downside I can see is if the file is big enough to be anywhere
close the 32767 frame limit. If 20-30 staves becomes 40-50, a dense piece
of several hundred measures could potentially hit it. A frame is an
internal
Christopher,
Your problems might be related to the frame count. I couldn't say for sure.
You could run Data Check and see what happens. I don't recall how to
display file stats in Fin06, but I believe there is a way. If the stats
show a frame count anywhere close 32767, you are in the danger
As you have noted, every solution to this issue is a workaround. But
maintaining a score that contains both a combined staff for the score and
separated staves for the parts seems like an attractive option. Whether you
create the separated staves first and combine them or create the combine
staff
Hi Doug,
Your method of single instruments to create the score, then combining them
afterward, is what I do generally.
To solve the doubled expression/articulation problem (which of course is WAY
worse in V26 with stacked articulations!) I set the filter to copy only
expressions and
I know the topic of trying to use voiced parts (all but useless to me as it
stands) has been covered and I’ve tried all the workarounds at various times
and know the issues, so I’m not asking about that. The TGTools plug-in “Smart
Explosion of multi-part staves…” often yields better results,
