Hi, Jason,
I have been running OroborOSX on 10.2.1 and Fink installed
xfree86-rootless (also have xfree86-base installed too). I have not
experienced the problems that you are having. In fact, I have no problem at
all.
Do you have a .cshrc file? Did you source /sw/bin/init.csh? I don't r
hi
glade install fails at the configure script with
checking for gnome-config... /sw/bin/gnome-config
checking for scrollkeeper-config... no
configure: error: Couldn't find scrollkeeper-config
./configure: exit: bad non-numeric arg `please'
./configure: exit: bad non-numeric arg `please'
### exe
This may not help much, but I commiserate with you. Actually, I've
given up on trying to mix any installations. It was too confusing, and
easy to get in trouble. I'm new to fink, but I'm trying to go the
fink route completely.
My pet window manger is fvwm2. It was very difficult to get go
Has anyone has sucess with 10.2.1/10.2.2 w/OroborOSX and a fink
installed X11 (xfree86-rootless). I can get it to run perhaps every 2
times out of 10, every other time it crashes and sucks up 100% of the
cpu running/crashing and running GDB.
I would really like to get this working, as TWN on O
Hi,
I have just installed fink, and have OS X 10.2.2 installed. I was
going to
fink install xfree86-rootless
until I noticed there is a threaded option. How to I go about finding
out if
this would be better for my two-processor system?
I am new to fink, but was amazed at how m
Martin,
Thank you very much. And please forgive me for my (embarrassing)
accidental inclusion of all that stuff. Looks like I better slow down
on the coffee.
Regards,
Dave
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 09:49 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
David J. Braden wrote:
Hi,
Msg I get repeatedly tod
Miles R. Fidelman wrote:
Is there any particular reason why /sw/bin/init.csh is set to put Fink's
directories first in the search path? That seems to mess up all kinds
of things - ranging from breaking man, to regressing cups from 1.1.15 to
1.1.14.
Fink is not supposed to break anything. If i
That should be in the faq, and it is:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#removing
Basically remove /sw, remove X if you have to, and remove the "source
/sw/bin/init.csh" from your .cshrc.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Miles R. Fidelman wrote:
> Is there a clean way to uninstall Fink and every
Is there a clean way to uninstall Fink and everything that it's
installed? I'm finding that it's doing just a few too many funny
things to my environment.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkge
Is there any particular reason why /sw/bin/init.csh is set to put
Fink's directories first in the search path? That seems to mess up all
kinds of things - ranging from breaking man, to regressing cups from
1.1.15 to 1.1.14.
---
This sf.net
Hi,
I'm having trouble doing a fink update-all: the gnome-libs don't seem
to be available on any server. I've done a
Failed: file download failed for gnome-libs-1.4.2.tar.bz2 of package
gnome-libs-1.4.2-1
I end up with similar errors for gtk+ and whatnot. What should I do
in a situation li
Hello Fink beginners and Ben
I've got a problem compiling kdemultimedia3 as part of KDE-bundle-ssl
I'm not sure what to do about it. The last bit of the output is pasted
below. Any help appreciated! Cheers, David Orlovich.
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX g++
-DHAV
Jordan Miller wrote:
Hi...
I have used FinkCommander to install xfree-base and xfree-rootless, but
unfortunately this does not install the XDarwin.app needed to launch
xfree86 (is this correct?).
The XDarwin.app is part of the xfree86-rootless package. If it didn't
get installed into /Applic
Hi...
I have used FinkCommander to install xfree-base and xfree-rootless, but
unfortunately this does not install the XDarwin.app needed to launch
xfree86 (is this correct?). Is there a way to install the XDarwin.app
application without running through their entire binary installers of
xfree86
ari gold wrote:
BTW, there are some quite readable explanations of these things on the
fink web pages :-)
really? i eventually found some info searching the list archives but a few
days ago, when i installed fink, i didnt come across anything. i clicked on
download, then new jaguar install,
hey, thanks for the email. good to hear things cleared up..
> For 10.2, it still is the only way. A binary distribution will come RSN,
> but it is not yet there.
>
> BTW, there are some quite readable explanations of these things on the
> fink web pages :-)
really? i eventually found some in
David J. Braden wrote:
Hi,
Msg I get repeatedly today is
checksum of tarball gal-0.19.tar.gz of package gal19-0.19-2 incorrect.
As you can see in the tons of messages you are quoting, the thing to do
is to notify the package maintainer. He will fix the problem quickly if
there is one.
Is that
Hi,
Msg I get repeatedly today is
checksum of tarball gal-0.19.tar.gz of package gal19-0.19-2 incorrect.
Is that safe to ignore?
TIA
Dave Braden
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 02:17 AM, fink-beginners-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send Fink-beginners mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Monday, Nov 4, 2002, at 20:25 Europe/Vienna, Alexander Hansen wrote:
See if a selfupdate-cvs makes it available to you--the source remains
the same.
[xxx:~] heinz% mozilla -mail &
[1] 472
[xxx:~] heinz%
Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
/sw/bin/mozilla: line 99: 473 Bus er
Michèle Garoche wrote:
Hello,
Each time I use xman, I get the man page in pdf format, which is not
really ideal to read.
In raw postscript, actually. This is an old bug in xfree86 for darwin,
and I thought it was fixed after we complained about it to the XonX guys
some 3 months ago. It seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
what gives? is that the only way?
For 10.2, it still is the only way. A binary distribution will come RSN,
but it is not yet there.
> heck, if it is, it is.. its still better
> than searching the net for the ispell distro and reading readmes and
such..
Yes, that
Nathan Weisz wrote:
Don't know if this is of any help.
Your message may be of help for you in the end, because it makes clear
that you don't have fink upgraded to Jaguar correctly.
After first installing Jaguar I had no problems using man whatsoever.
However, after installing Scilab I get foll
Hello,
Each time I use xman, I get the man page in pdf format, which is not
really ideal to read.
What do I need to do in order to have the man pages displayed as nice
formatted text for reading on the screen?
Michèle
---
This sf.net email
Don't know if this is of any help.
After first installing Jaguar I had no problems using man whatsoever.
However, after installing Scilab I get following message:
> /usr/bin/man: illegal option -- C
> man, version 1.1
Removing scilab gave me full man functionality back. The file which caused
the p
24 matches
Mail list logo
