Good to hear. I am CCing the maintainer. This might not be completely
easy to solve (qmake-based build procedure!). But at least we know a
workaround.
Martin
Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
> Indeed removing qwt-qt4-x11-shlibs did solve the problem. Everthing went
> ok. Thank you. S.
>
> $ sudo fin
Indeed removing qwt-qt4-x11-shlibs did solve the problem. Everthing went ok.
Thank you. S.
$ sudo fink remove qwt-qt4-x11 qwt-qt4-x11-shlibs
Information about 9174 packages read in 1 seconds.
Reading buildlock packages...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait --remove qwt-qt4-x11 qwt-qt4-x11-shlibs
(Lecture de l
Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
> Indeed I made a symbolic link to the library and goffice did compile.
>
> However I get another error:
While building the qwt-qt4-x11 package, I presume?
> [...]
> bzip2 -dc /sw/src/qwt-5.2.0.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-owner
> --no-same-permissions
> [...]
Indeed I made a symbolic link to the library and goffice did compile.
However I get another error:
[...]
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/qwt-5.2.0.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-owner
--no-same-permissions
[...]
c++ -prebind -o ../../examples/bin/cpuplot obj/cpuplot.o obj/cpustat.o
obj/cpupiemarker.o o
Builds on OS X hardcode the linked library information. I'd expect that
something else on your system hardcoded that and goffice is using that
information.
Normally what would have been hardcoded would have been
'/usr/X11/lib/libpixman-1.dylib' , but for some reason it was decided
not to do that
Moreover:
$ ls /usr/X11/lib/libpixman*
/usr/X11/lib/libpixman-1.0.11.8.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libpixman-1.0.dylib
/usr/X11/lib/libpixman-1.dylib /usr/X11/lib/libpixman-1.la
Does this mean that the package 'libgoffice-0.6-0.6.6-2' hardcoded the
library version?
S.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:48 PM,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:48 PM, monipol wrote:
> On 17/07/2009, at 12:41, Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, monipol wrote:
>> On 17/07/2009, at 11:47, Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I would like to build kdvi or okular.
However, fink refuses to updat
On 17/07/2009, at 12:41, Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, monipol wrote:
> On 17/07/2009, at 11:47, Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to build kdvi or okular.
>>>
>>> However, fink refuses to update-all.
>>> ---
>>> $ time sudo fink selfupdate; time sudo fink
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, monipol wrote:
> On 17/07/2009, at 11:47, Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
>
>> I would like to build kdvi or okular.
>>
>> However, fink refuses to update-all.
>> ---
>> $ time sudo fink selfupdate; time sudo fink update-all
>> [...]
>> gtk-doc: Linking scanner
>> gcc -O
On 17/07/2009, at 11:47, Stéphane Zampelli wrote:
> I would like to build kdvi or okular.
>
> However, fink refuses to update-all.
> ---
> $ time sudo fink selfupdate; time sudo fink update-all
> [...]
> gtk-doc: Linking scanner
> gcc -Os -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare -Wpointer-arith
(.
Hi,
I would like to build kdvi or okular.
However, fink refuses to update-all.
Any idea?
Thank you,
S.
---
$ time sudo fink selfupdate; time sudo fink update-all
[...]
gtk-doc: Linking scanner
gcc -Os -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare -Wpointer-arith
-Wnested-externs -Wchar-subscripts
11 matches
Mail list logo
