there is still a deb file aka binary distribution for openssl it’s self though.
Seems like an odd exception, I’m going to look deeper into it, and consult my
lawyer on it.
---
TS
http://www.southofheaven.org/
Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 10:27 P
It's part of the OS on Linux distros, so that's no problem.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 21:11, TheSin wrote:
>
> how does debian do it? They provide a binary distribution of it and tons of
> software linked to it?
>
> I know fink isn’t debian, but just saying they can do it so h
how does debian do it? They provide a binary distribution of it and tons of
software linked to it?
I know fink isn’t debian, but just saying they can do it so how?
---
TS
http://www.southofheaven.org/
Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Hanspe
How does the ongoing openssl100 migration deal with the whole GPL vs
openssl license issue? We could get away with it before because 1)
linking with system-openssl used a system provided library, and 2) we
did not have a binary distribution. However, #2 is no longer valid, and
#1 will also be
