snip
Thinking further, it might be best not to get cute and just set up a
10.9-libc++ distribution in CVS, and then do the git migration after we club
all of the packages that won’t work or don’t want on ElCaveman.
Yeah, that would be safest for now. It could be a bit much to make the
No surprise there. :-)
I was going to initialize the 10.9-libc++ distribution, but then I got to
thinking about whether it might not be a bad plan to use a cvs import of the
10.7 tree and then rename the directory, so that we can preserve the history.
Thoughts?
--
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink
On Jun 10, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 10, 2015, at 09:53, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 10, 2015, at 09:50, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:34:05 -0700, Alexander Hansen
On Jun 10, 2015, at 09:53, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 10, 2015, at 09:50, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:34:05 -0700, Alexander Hansen
alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote:
No surprise there. :-)
I was going to
