[Fink-devel] Removing sketch package

2002-01-13 Thread Jeremy Higgs
Hi everyone! Just a note to all the developers out there... I'm removing the sketch package in unstable, because it doesn't work. It's an old package of mine left-over from earlier days, and I've tried to fix that (and newer upstream versions), but it refuses to recognise the presence of tcl/tk (

Re: [Fink-devel] man/mann

2002-01-13 Thread David R. Morrison
Maybe we can also file a bug report with Apple and ask them to restore o, l, n to /etc/man.conf? ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.3.2a

2002-01-13 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:47 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> Apple is claiming to work towards POSIX, but so far I haven't seen >> much on that front. But actually, I'd prefer if they would finally >> fixing some of the really bad errors and shortcomings in the Unix >> part of OS X (like

Re: [Fink-devel] man/mann

2002-01-13 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Max: I think the best solution for now is to create fink man package and have packages like tcltk that put stuff in sections not supported by the apple man, depend on it. To that end, I've added a man package to unstable. Eventually, I if this works satisfactorily, I think we should consider ma

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Warning: message 16P1Ii-0005ZZ-00 delayed 48 hours

2002-01-13 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:38 pm, Max Horn wrote: > Interesting, interesting :) > > Maybe I should resend it? Or e-mail the guy that the domain is registered to. Use whois. -- Finlay ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.3.2a

2002-01-13 Thread Max Horn
At 22:30 Uhr + 13.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:21 pm, Max Horn wrote: > >>Apple is claiming to work towards POSIX, but so far I haven't seen >>much on that front. > >They have claimed that? When? In fact, I think I've heard them claim >quite the opposite

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.3.2a

2002-01-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote: > At 11:06 Uhr -0800 13.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: > > > >> Goddamn Apple for removing gnutar in OS X (even if it was only in the > >> Developer Tools... grrr). > > > >Yeah... I love how the Darwin system is e

[Fink-devel] Fwd: Warning: message 16P1Ii-0005ZZ-00 delayed 48 hours

2002-01-13 Thread Max Horn
>Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Warning: message 16P1Ii-0005ZZ-00 delayed 48 hours >Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:09:18 +0100 > >This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > >A message that you sent

Re: [Fink-devel] man/mann

2002-01-13 Thread Max Horn
I know very well that various packages (including tcltk) are using mann, mano and manl. The fact that xman lists them doesn't mean anything to me, BTW, neither pro nor contra these directories. But since you brought it up, let's look at it: At 7:11 Uhr -0700 13.01.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote: >

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.3.2a

2002-01-13 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:21 pm, Max Horn wrote: > Apple is claiming to work towards POSIX, but so far I haven't seen much > on that front. They have claimed that? When? In fact, I think I've heard them claim quite the opposite: that they don't care about being POSIX compliant, jus

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.3.2a

2002-01-13 Thread Max Horn
At 11:06 Uhr -0800 13.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote: >On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: > >> Darwin's tar is BSD tar, and BSD tar behaves differently from GNU tar >> when it comes to long file names. I think it can cope with them, though, >> if the archive is created with BSD tar in the