[Fink-devel] QT3

When i try and run qmake this is what I get. Should we be setting the value for this in the Qt3 install? Or is it a temp value I should be setting in the CompileScript? QMAKESPEC has not been set, so configuration cannot be deduced. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., J

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems with fnlib, libungif, python

Max Horn wrote: > It works just fine for me. OK, so it seems I caught them on a bad day. > [...] > Hehe, nice name tag =) Where did you get that link from? Somehow I came across the list of participants of that conference. And it's good to see that our he

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome panel fish applet

Fixed in gnome-core-1.4.0.6-2. Thanks for reportging, On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 11:54:15 -0700 "Justin Hallett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** WARNING **: CORBA plugin load failed: not a Mach-O MH_BUNDLE file type > > ** CRITICAL **: file goad.c: line 840 (goad_server_activate_shlib): > assertion `

[Fink-devel] Re: gnome-vfs-ssl missing pkgconfig dependency

Solved in updated gnome-vfs(-ssl)-1.0.4-1. Thanks for reporting. On Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:03:41 -0500 Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (cc'ing the maintainer) > > I'm trying to build the new gnome-vfs-ssl and it appears to be > missing a dependency on pkgconfig: -- Masanori Sekino mai

Re: [Fink-devel] NO! Never depend on openssl if you are in main! (was: Problems with fnlib, libungif, python)

On Thursday, February 7, 2002, at 06:59 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > A small footnote on this: There has been a proposed openldap-ssl > package > sitting in the package submission tracker for a couple of weeks, if that > makes someone's work easier. Please assign it to me. I hope I'll get r

Re: [Fink-devel] binaries and shared libraries in the same package?

Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > >Perhaps this should be kept in mind when working on the new package format; > >if you go to a variants system, maybe it's a good idea to be able to build > >multiple sub-packages from a single info file to keep from building X 4 > >times for one set of packag

Re: [Fink-devel] NO! Never depend on openssl if you are in main! (was: Problems with fnlib, libungif, python)

A small footnote on this: There has been a proposed openldap-ssl package sitting in the package submission tracker for a couple of weeks, if that makes someone's work easier. -- Dave ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.source

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems with fnlib, libungif, python

At 17:53 Uhr +0100 07.02.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >Hi, > >while rebuilding packages caught by Max' old-library script, I got >stuck with fnlib and libungif that could not download their sources. >There seems to be some bitrot creeping in. Both are packages with >ChrisP as maintainer. > >fnl

Re: [Fink-devel] binaries and shared libraries in the samepackage?

At 21:27 Uhr -0500 06.02.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: >David R. Morrison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: >> I gave the argument for making the split above. Here's an argument for >> NOT splitting: after all, a lot of this pkg/pkg-shlibs split is designed >> to accomodate a future library revision, wh

[Fink-devel] NO! Never depend on openssl if you are in main! (was: Problemswith fnlib, libungif, python)

At 17:53 Uhr +0100 07.02.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: [...] >The next surprise came when I updated xchat (not xchat-ssl!). It >still wanted to install openssl, which I stubbornly refuse on this >one machine. The reason for wanting openssl apparently is that the >python package depends on open

[Fink-devel] Problems with fnlib, libungif, python

Hi, while rebuilding packages caught by Max' old-library script, I got stuck with fnlib and libungif that could not download their sources. There seems to be some bitrot creeping in. Both are packages with ChrisP as maintainer. fnlib looks at the ftp.enlightenment.org server which refuses co