Re: [Fink-devel] Request for Assistance: Packaging for mutella

2002-03-16 Thread Max Horn
At 14:05 Uhr + 15.03.2002, Gregory Block wrote: We're nearing release, and I'd like someone to help me with getting a package ready for mutella. I'm responsible for the port of Mutella to MacOS X, and will be taking over as package maintainer for some time while Max, who's done much of the

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS commit rules

2002-03-16 Thread Max Horn
At 17:04 Uhr +1100 16.03.2002, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 15/3/02 10:52 PM, David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to remind all core fink developers of the most important rule when committing things to CVS: IF YOU HAVE MADE ANY CHANGE TO YOUR PACKAGE, YOU MUST INCREASE THE

Re: [Fink-devel] sub-heredoc (was Re: BuildDependsOnly)

2002-03-16 Thread Max Horn
At 16:18 Uhr -0500 15.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing that occurred to me while packaging is, is there a way to do multilines inside a splitoff? While making the kdelibs package, I have a huge line of files in the Files: section of

Re: [Fink-devel] sub-heredoc (was Re: BuildDependsOnly)

2002-03-16 Thread Max Horn
At 11:43 Uhr +0100 16.03.2002, Max Horn wrote: At 16:18 Uhr -0500 15.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing that occurred to me while packaging is, is there a way to do multilines inside a splitoff? While making the kdelibs package, I have a

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS commit rules

2002-03-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Jeremy Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi David, Just to clarify things... A couple of minutes ago, I updated the download URL for qcad (in unstable), due to a report from a user that the previous URL no longer worked. I assume this is OK, as no recompilation of the package is necessary?

[Fink-devel] Last Splitoff changes in CVS - please test now!

2002-03-16 Thread Max Horn
OK, I just put the (hopefully) last part of the splitoff change into CVS: build dependencies of splitoffs and their parents are now always properly computed (previously, this was not at all correct, one just didn't notice it in many cases). In addition, I removed the annoying debug message

[Fink-devel] new problem with splitoff build dependencies

2002-03-16 Thread Max Horn
I was updating audiofile (which I previously had installed in an older, non-splitoff, but shlibs enabled version. That's what happend: % fink update libjpeg ... ln -sf /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libjpeg-bin_6b-5_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/debs/ rm -rf

Re: [Fink-devel] Last Splitoff changes in CVS - please test now!

2002-03-16 Thread Jeremy Higgs
snip Just out of interest, Max, what's the easiest way to use the split-off packages when using 'fink selfupdate-cvs'? As far as I know, the split-offs module is not checked out when using this, so should someone wishing to try out the split-off packages check the module out manually and

Re: [Fink-devel] Last Splitoff changes in CVS - please test now!

2002-03-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Jeremy Higgs wrote: Just out of interest, Max, what's the easiest way to use the split-off packages when using 'fink selfupdate-cvs'? As far as I know, the split-offs module is not checked out when using this, so should someone wishing to try out the split-off packages check the module out