On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 12:43 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> I don't think it's that silly. Think about it. There has been at least
> one security hole in OS X (in NetInfo) in the past that could only be
> exploited by local users to gain root. On my box, that's only me, so
> almost no risk. On
I'm not sure but I think it needs the new dlcompat. I need this libs for
a few port and they are always unsable. And for some reason this two libs
are the only two that don't have dynamic libs only the a.out. Anyhow keep
me posted.
configure:8754: checking for XvShmCreateImage in -lXv
configur
At 7:29 Uhr -0700 13.04.2002, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Randal" == Randal L Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Randal> The bleeding edge Perl rightfully notes that line 22 of /sw/bin/fink
>Randal> is unportable, and should be replaced with:
>
>Randal> require 5.6;
>
>Gah. T
> "Randal" == Randal L Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Randal> The bleeding edge Perl rightfully notes that line 22 of /sw/bin/fink
Randal> is unportable, and should be replaced with:
Randal> require 5.6;
Gah. Too early in the morning.
require 5.006;
Randal> That suf
The bleeding edge Perl rightfully notes that line 22 of /sw/bin/fink
is unportable, and should be replaced with:
require 5.6;
That suffices.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/
"David R. Morrison" wrote:
>
> About six weeks ago I brought up the issue of making a system-ghostscript
> package (message reproduced below). Jeff objected (also reproduced below)
> but I would like to revisit the issue, because there is a forthcoming
> OzTeX CD which will have Gerben Wierda's
About six weeks ago I brought up the issue of making a system-ghostscript
package (message reproduced below). Jeff objected (also reproduced below)
but I would like to revisit the issue, because there is a forthcoming
OzTeX CD which will have Gerben Wierda's teTeX/ghostscript installer on
it, as
