Re: [Fink-devel] Fink CD

At 3:39 PM +0200 2002/04/10, Max Horn wrote: >First off, I'd like to keep the discussion regarding a Fink CD >completly free of mentioning OpenOSX. I don't feel such a CD should >be made to spite anybody, but if at all for it's own good. Anyway, >here are some quick thought of mine on this: > >

[Fink-devel] Problems with the Fink expat package

In compiling my Apache 2.0.35, I ran into a minor problem regarding expat. I wanted to link my existing libexpat into my apache, so I provided apache with the needed options (--with-expat=/sw). I created a local package local-apache-deps-0.0.1-1 to ensure that the stuff stayed installed, and

[Fink-devel] holding back package upgrade (was: Calling mozilla)

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:30:55PM -0400, Chris Devers wrote: > [...] > > >Type: bundle > > >Depends: xfree86-base (= 4.2.0-4), xfree86-rootless (= 4.2.0-2) > > >Description: Prevents automatic update... > > It's an interesting strategy, but still kind of a pain. I like the earlier > thought abou

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: > > I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I > > get it running on my own machine, overwriting Apple's version > > 1.3. > > The other day I asked about packaging later

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 12:56 AM, Ken Williams wrote: > On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I get it >> running on my own machine, overwriting Apple's version 1.3. > > The other day I asked about

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: > I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I > get it running on my own machine, overwriting Apple's version > 1.3. The other day I asked about packaging later versions of perl, and was told that fink overwriti

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Max Horn wrote: > At 17:54 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote: >>> At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could >>

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: > I was looking at Apache 2.0 and I decided to install it on my system. Not sure how helpful this is, but you might want to take a look here: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/macosx/httpd-apache_2.0.35-powerpc-apple-darwin5.3.tar.gz Despite the

[Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

I was looking at Apache 2.0 and I decided to install it on my system. I looked at the patches it needs for Mac OS X, and one is for the libtool. Can someone please clear up the issue of '-undefined error/warning' vs. '-undefined suppress -flat_namespace' in ltconfig. Can someone please tell

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

At 17:54 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote: >>At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >>>I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could >>>update itself to the latest cvs would be helpful >> >>"fink selfup

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote: > At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could update >> itself to the latest cvs would be helpful > > "fink selfupdate-cvs" > > It's already there. All essential packa

Re: Fwd: RE: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Calling mozilla

Chris Devers wrote: > > >Create (and install) a small package in the local tree containing > > >lines like (add any number of packages you want to the Depends line): > > > > > >Type: bundle > > >Depends: xfree86-base (= 4.2.0-4), xfree86-rootless (= 4.2.0-2) > > >Description: Prevents automatic u

Re: Fwd: RE: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Calling mozilla

On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote: > >Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:25:35 +0200 > >Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) > >Subject: RE: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Calling mozilla > >From: Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Max Horn <[E

Fwd: RE: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Calling mozilla

>Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:25:35 +0200 >Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) >Subject: RE: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Calling mozilla >From: Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >(Am not on the dev-list, and d

[Fink-devel] package names when shared libraries are incidental

Hi. There was a discussion on #fink a week or so ago about what package names to use when the shared libraries are incidental rather than a central function of the package in question. The suggestion being discussed was that there could be two naming conventions: foo, foo-shlibs, and foo-bin

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

could we add a switch for this? like -Ddlsym=dlsym_auto_prepend or something? I agree with the case by case but it's lots of work and i prefer and auto lazy way :P [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Uhm yeah well, we could add code to automatically prepend an >underscore if a symbol lookup fails, but

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

At 7:40 Uhr -0700 16.04.2002, John Clark wrote: >Am Dienstag den, 16. April 2002, um 06:34, schrieb Max Horn: > >>At 13:13 Uhr +0200 16.04.2002, Andrew de los Reyes wrote: >>>hey, after going through the annoyance of not having dl*() on darwin, >>>i finally got those functions working (at lease dl

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

At 8:26 Uhr -0600 16.04.2002, Justin Hallett wrote: >it would be nice if we didn't have to do this. I know in my xine port i >need to beable to use both which is a pain, though i'm not sure why i need >both yet. Uhm yeah well, we could add code to automatically prepend an underscore if a symbol

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

well if you have fink then 10.1.3 does have dlcompat. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Well, yes, however, Mac OS X 10.1.3 does not have dlcompat, and I have >noticed many >posters seem to be using a Mac OS X system for 'darwin' development. >(myself included...) > >Also, it was a less than easy inst

[Fink-devel] rsync

Bugs fixed in 2.5.5 (2.5.2 actually has some fairly nasty issues that were fixed in later versions): * Work around bug in Mac OS X mkdir(2), which cannot handle trailing slashes. (Martin Pool) (There w

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

Am Dienstag den, 16. April 2002, um 06:34, schrieb Max Horn: > At 13:13 Uhr +0200 16.04.2002, Andrew de los Reyes wrote: >> hey, after going through the annoyance of not having dl*() on darwin, >> i finally got those functions working (at lease dlopen, dlsym, and >> dlclose). i borrowed the code

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

it would be nice if we didn't have to do this. I know in my xine port i need to beable to use both which is a pain, though i'm not sure why i need both yet. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >So does ours, if you change the cc line to be cc >-Ddlsym=dlsym_prepend_underscore ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 10:45 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > At 3:34 PM +0200 4/16/02, Max Horn wrote: >> >> Uhm, sorry, you are lagging behind a year or so ... :-) >> dlcompat, which also provides these functions, has been >> available for ages, from Apple's Darwin CVS. And we did a >> compl

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Calling mozilla

At 21:39 Uhr -0400 15.04.2002, Chris Devers wrote: >On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Kilian Koepsell wrote: > >> but maybe, it would be a nice feature to be able to exclude certain >> packages from update-all like it is possible to exclude them from >> apt-get upgrade. this way you could prevent fink from

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > >>At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote: >>>I have a proposal to make: >>> >>>Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package >>>manager newer than the latest bin

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

At 3:34 PM +0200 4/16/02, Max Horn wrote: > >Uhm, sorry, you are lagging behind a year or so ... :-) dlcompat, >which also provides these functions, has been available for ages, >from Apple's Darwin CVS. And we did a complete rewrite from scratch >with enhanced features just recently. For the

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

At 13:13 Uhr +0200 16.04.2002, Andrew de los Reyes wrote: >hey, after going through the annoyance of not having dl*() on darwin, >i finally got those functions working (at lease dlopen, dlsym, and >dlclose). i borrowed the code from python as was suggested. > >anyway, people might benefit from the

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: > I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink > could update itself to the latest cvs would be helpful % sudo fink selfupdate-cvs ? -- Chris Devers[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache / mod_perl / http://homepage.ma

[Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

hey, after going through the annoyance of not having dl*() on darwin, i finally got those functions working (at lease dlopen, dlsym, and dlclose). i borrowed the code from python as was suggested. anyway, people might benefit from the following files (maybe a link from the doc web page where shar

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> I have a proposal to make: >> >> Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package >> manager newer than the latest bindist should include a FinkVersion tag >> that would