Re: [Fink-devel] bindist on the servers

2002-09-30 Thread Max Horn
At 22:27 Uhr +0200 30.09.2002, Max Horn wrote: >At 22:16 Uhr +0200 30.09.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >>There seems to be a misconfiguration on the bindist servers: On >>http://eu.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/fink/direct_download/dists/ >>for example, there are "current" and "release" symlinks.

Re: [Fink-devel] bindist on the servers

2002-09-30 Thread Max Horn
At 22:16 Uhr +0200 30.09.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >There seems to be a misconfiguration on the bindist servers: On >http://eu.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/fink/direct_download/dists/ >for example, there are "current" and "release" symlinks. Both point >to 0.4.0 and not to 0.4.1 as they shou

[Fink-devel] bindist on the servers

2002-09-30 Thread Martin Costabel
There seems to be a misconfiguration on the bindist servers: On http://eu.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/fink/direct_download/dists/ for example, there are "current" and "release" symlinks. Both point to 0.4.0 and not to 0.4.1 as they should. The result is that apt-get and dselect don't see 0.4.

Re: [Fink-devel] db4, db41, and gift

2002-09-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 02:42 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > > OK, so I had the problem because I did a "update-all", which tried to > install db41 before updating gift. And the Conflicts was only with the > bogus version of db4-shlibs? So it reduces to another one of those > cases w

Re: [Fink-devel] New port: package libquicktime0

2002-09-30 Thread James Watson
Oops, I've now done as you suggested. Thanks James On Sunday, September 29, 2002, at 04:24 pm, Martin Costabel wrote: > James Watson wrote: > >> (N.B. The patch is about 40KB so I had to compress it to get it into >> the mailing list > > That's why there is the package-submission tracker... >