[Fink-devel] ****Business Proposal****

2002-11-06 Thread jmusa4
NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY NIGERIAN WATER WAYS APAPA, LAGOS.NIGERIA CELL PHONE:234-804-213-8559 REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DEAR FRIEND, YOUR COMPANY'S NAME AND ADDRESS WAS GOTTEN FROM A BUSINESS DIRECTORY IN MY SEARCH FOR A WELL KNOWN BUSINESSMAN WHO HAS NO QUESTIONABLE CHARACTER AND

Re: [Fink-devel] node error back

2002-11-06 Thread Ben Hines
Yes, i saw that... However a "non smooth" update is fine as long as there is a legible error message.. "node for foo already exists" is a bug. :) -Ben On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 05:51 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Yes, there was a problem with xforms-1.0 and lyx, so Jeff has put a lo

Re: [Fink-devel] node error back

2002-11-06 Thread David R. Morrison
Yes, there was a problem with xforms-1.0 and lyx, so Jeff has put a lower version of xforms back in the tree and made lyx depend on this lower version. I'm not sure what we can do to make the upgrade smooth, though. -- Dave Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something about the lyx + xfor

[Fink-devel] node error back

2002-11-06 Thread Ben Hines
Something about the lyx + xforms update causes it. I have perhaps a strange combo of packages to update: ~ 155 % fink list lyx xforms Information about 1819 packages read in 1 seconds. (i) lyx1.2.1-2Wordprocessor utilizing LaTeX i xforms 1.0-2 GU

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.5.0 timetable

2002-11-06 Thread Alexander Strange
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 06:59 AM, Max Horn wrote: could still make them essential again in the future). Since both are only used as tools (yeah, bzip2 also has a lib, but fink itself is not making use of that), this should be simple to achieve... kdebase should be using it for the b

Re: [Fink-devel] Deep dependencies in tcl

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 11:40 AM, Jose' Cruanyes wrote: On Mercoledì, nov 6, 2002, at 17:13 Europe/Rome, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: How are variations best handled in fink? I think one solution could be have a dummy package (u

Re: [Fink-devel] Deep dependencies in tcl

2002-11-06 Thread Jose' Cruanyes
On Mercoledì, nov 6, 2002, at 17:13 Europe/Rome, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: How are variations best handled in fink? I think one solution could be have a dummy package (using the postgresql example) postgresql depends postgresql-complete | postgresql-cxx | postgresql-java | postgresql-javape

Re: [Fink-devel] Deep dependencies in tcl

2002-11-06 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Jose'" == Jose' Cruanyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> I'm trying to install a package, (postgresql but it is not the Jose'> problem) that depends on other packages (python, tcltk and others) Jose'> these packages are fat ones and depends in a huge list of other, Jose'> leading to an e

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.5.0 timetable

2002-11-06 Thread Max Horn
At 19:25 Uhr -0500 05.11.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: > In fact, bzip2 should be split off since it has a dylib and header... Yes, and a similar remark applies to several other "essential" packages like gettext and ncurses. However, making changes to essential packages without breaking thi

Re: [Fink-devel] Deep dependencies in tcl

2002-11-06 Thread Stephan Jaeger
Hi Everybody, What I wonder in that respect is why the builtin version of tcl is not sufficient for the fink packages. I ask myself about the openssl package... Any ideas? To use the builtin versions would make life easier, wouldn't it? Thanks in advance for any explanation, Stephan On Wednesd

[Fink-devel] Deep dependencies in tcl

2002-11-06 Thread Jose' Cruanyes
Hi all I'm trying to install a package, (postgresql but it is not the problem) that depends on other packages (python, tcltk and others) these packages are fat ones and depends in a huge list of other, leading to an exploding list of packages to be installed ie postgresql (optionally) needs tcl