On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 06:41 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
I'm going to try to port fink to MkLinux so I don't have to use rpm
anymore (of course it will have to always build from source and not
use the binary packages).
An easier (and more package-complete) alternative would be
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 10:43 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
This probably also explains why i have no sections in dselect... Does
anyone?
I do, for some packages (both available and installed). On the Debian
system, the section comes from the Packages and Packages.gz files which
are
I just installed turxracer with the .info file created by Mr. Kiwi. It
installed without any problem and the program ran well too.
Just out of curiosity, are the issues raised by Mr. Hines serious problems
for the .info file? Has my installation of tuxracer caused some catastrophic
event to my
The comments which Ben Hines made were things which need to be addressed
before the package could be included in Fink. We try to make sure that
all of the Fink packages work well together, both now and in the future,
and that's the purpose of these standards.
What normally happens when someone
[for context: I just changed Engine.pm in CVS to use --info-dir
instead of --infodir as argument to install-info, as I got repeatedly
error reports by people which have /usr/bin before /sw/sbin in their
PATH; thus for them the texinfo install-info was used, not the dpkg
install-info we
I have made a local package for pan 0.13.2 some time ago, but I keep
getting the same error:
% pan
(Pan:23558): Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
(Pan:23558): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
Using the fallback 'C' locale.
** (pan-real:23558):
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 07:32 PM, Max Horn wrote:
I have made a local package for pan 0.13.2 some time ago, but I keep
getting the same error:
% pan
(Pan:23558): Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
(Pan:23558): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
At 19:41 Uhr -0500 11.11.2002, Alexander Strange wrote:
[...]
What version of xfree86-base are you running?
system-xfree86 4.2-1Placeholder package for manually installe...
i xfree86-base 4.2.1.1-1XFree86 libraries, utilities, clients and...
i xfree86-base-sh
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 10:09 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
What normally happens when someone writes a new package is that they
submit it using the Package Submission tracker and then they get
comments
like that in response. The comments are still public, but in that case
they won't
At 17:34 Uhr -0800 11.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 04:32 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Note that this used to occur in the past, too, and that I have as a
workaround GDK_USE_XFT set to 1. But for some reasons this is not
working anymore... anybody got a hint for me what
Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[for context: I just changed Engine.pm in CVS to use --info-dir
instead of --infodir as argument to install-info, as I got repeatedly
error reports by people which have /usr/bin before /sw/sbin in their
PATH; thus for them the texinfo install-info was
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:01 PM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 10:43 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
This probably also explains why i have no sections in dselect... Does
anyone?
I do, for some packages (both available and installed). On the Debian
system,
Hi Anthony,
Funny you should mention this I just managed to get Debian's Potato
installed on my 6100/66 yesterday. Still not able to get the right
video mode, mouse keyboard for Xwindows/Gnome but the new 2.4.4
kernel is faster than MkLinux and I'm much happier with the choice of
packages.
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 23:04, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Funny you should mention this I just managed to get Debian's Potato
installed on my 6100/66 yesterday.
Ugh. Why potato? Woody is out now, and I think you'll find it much
better. New XFree86, for example.
And, oh yeah, twice as
14 matches
Mail list logo