On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 02:57 PM, Max Horn wrote:
It also apparently caused problems for some packages, maybe as you say
only for gcc2 using packages, but that makes not much difference to
me. IMO it is definitly not a good idea to just unconditionally use
ccache all the time for
At 14:43 Uhr -0800 14.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Perhaps the time to mention this was when i asked on fink-devel. I
made sure to ask. Noone objected.
I am sorry then, I totally must have missed that mail then (can
happen if you get 200-300 mails/day).
The ONLY problems i have had with ccache
Perhaps the time to mention this was when i asked on fink-devel. I made
sure to ask. Noone objected.
The ONLY problems i have had with ccache has been with gcc2 packages.
In fact I plan to remove those gcc2 symlinks so it only affects gcc3. I
am quite certain that, as you claim, ccache does NOT
Dear Fink maintainers,
I have just installed the recode-3.6-6 package (currently in unstable)
under Mac OS X 10.2.2, and it apparently works well: I was able to
successfully recode several files.
Thanks,
Michel.
--
Package manager version: 0.11.0
Distribution version: 0.4.9.cvs
Mac OS X version
I plan to produce the 0.5.0 distribution beginning next Monday, November 18.
If you have anything to move to stable, please do so prior to Monday. The
10.2/stable tree will be frozen several days as the distribution is prepared.
-- Dave
---
