Re: [Fink-devel] packaging tutorial needed

2002-11-24 Thread David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Montag, November 25, 2002, at 03:06 Uhr, Ben Hines wrote: Fink is badly in need of a "packaging tutorial", ie a "10 step guide" to making a COMPLIANT fink package. Anyone feel like helping with this? I will be your copy editor. :) Please

[Fink-devel] packaging tutorial needed

2002-11-24 Thread Ben Hines
Fink is badly in need of a "packaging tutorial", ie a "10 step guide" to making a COMPLIANT fink package. Anyone feel like helping with this? I will be your copy editor. :) -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek

[Fink-devel] freeze over

2002-11-24 Thread David R. Morrison
The code freeze is lifted. Thanks for your cooperation. -- Dave --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PR

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Guido Draheim
Benjamin Reed wrote: On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:44 PM, Guido Draheim wrote: You mean they are listed as ".la" on the link-line? To stick with the example, there is a LIB_KDEGAMES = libkdegames.la in your makefiles? aargh, kde maniacs at work No, it would be, libfoo_la_LIBADD

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:44 PM, Guido Draheim wrote: You mean they are listed as ".la" on the link-line? To stick with the example, there is a LIB_KDEGAMES = libkdegames.la in your makefiles? aargh, kde maniacs at work No, it would be, libfoo_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/kdec

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Guido Draheim
Benjamin Reed wrote: On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:17 PM, Guido Draheim wrote: That's actually the difference between "-all-static" and "-static" IIRC. The "-static" should only link its .la's as static, and non-la's dynamic. But perhaps I am mistaken too, that's why I did ask if you did

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 05:17 PM, Guido Draheim wrote: That's actually the difference between "-all-static" and "-static" IIRC. The "-static" should only link its .la's as static, and non-la's dynamic. But perhaps I am mistaken too, that's why I did ask if you did try somewhen. Well,

[Fink-devel] Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Guido Draheim
Benjamin Reed wrote: On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 04:54 PM, Guido Draheim wrote: The only hint that I can give has the form of a question: Did you try kbackgammon_LDADD = -static kbackgammon.la $(LIB_KDEGAMES) $(LIB_KSYCOCA) kbackgammon_SOURCES = dummy.cpp $ ./libtool --help --mode=lin

[Fink-devel] Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 04:54 PM, Guido Draheim wrote: The only hint that I can give has the form of a question: Did you try kbackgammon_LDADD = -static kbackgammon.la $(LIB_KDEGAMES) $(LIB_KSYCOCA) kbackgammon_SOURCES = dummy.cpp $ ./libtool --help --mode=link | grep static -all-s

[Fink-devel] Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Guido Draheim
Benjamin Reed wrote: [...] ---(snip!)--- kbackgammon_la_LDFLAGS = $(all_libraries) $(KDE_RPATH) -module -avoid-version kbackgammon_LDADD = kbackgammon.la $(LIB_KDEGAMES) $(LIB_KSYCOCA) kbackgammon_SOURCES = dummy.cpp ---(snip!)--- ...this is a no-no, kbackgammon is trying to link against a bund

[Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-24 Thread Benjamin Reed
One of the problems we're running into getting KDE working on Darwin is libtool's concept of a "module", and how it's mapped onto Darwin's linker behavior. On Darwin, unlike most other unixen (as far as I'm aware), loadable modules and dynamic shared libraries are 2 distinctly different entiti