On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 10:02 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The PDB is stored in a MySQL database. And old entries are normally
left in the DB unless explicitly overwritten, so when a package is
removed, it may not be removed from the PDB. Somebody would have to
go over the DB and clean o
Ok, that took about 5 minutes to set up.
Password protected with our database user/password (found in
~/db.inc.php, only readable to fink developers). I also passworded the
webstats area.
http://fink.sourceforge.net/phpmyadmin/
Now we can easily find/remove the stray packages. For example we m
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 02:02 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I don't know MySQL, but couldn't the SQL request check to make sure
that the package is listed in one of the current groups, before
including it in the output? (Or would the overhead be too great?)
Yes this should be possible
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:55 Uhr +0100 08.12.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
> >In the package database on the fink web site, there are still
> >package descriptions for xfree86-rootless and xfree86-server,
> >although these packages are marked as "Not present" in all
> >distribu
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:28 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
BTW, there is also an HOWTO on how to update the PDB in the scripts
CVS module.
Yes i am seeing if I can do it now. There are a few issues like I
don't have execute access to the finksql script, but I know what it
does anyway so i
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:22 PM, Max Horn wrote:
At 12:11 Uhr -0800 08.12.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Very strange, the PDB is now only showing packages that are NOT in the 10.2 tree - ie, the same packages that are on my "not yet moved" list like yorick, r-recommended, gnupg-egd. It is not
At 14:59 Uhr +0100 08.12.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
I'd like to appeal to you clever guys, in particular the kde
wizards, to help me with the Scribus package. I have spent quite
some time on this package, but it is now clear it is too big a fish
for my modest knowledge of c++, libtool, qt, da
At 12:11 Uhr -0800 08.12.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Very strange, the PDB is now only showing packages that are NOT in
the 10.2 tree - ie, the same packages that are on my "not yet
moved" list like yorick, r-recommended, gnupg-egd. It is not showing
any package that is in both trees.
Max will you
At 15:54 Uhr +0100 08.12.2002, Christian Schaffner wrote:
I propose that, for the next six months or so, we add a fourth listing to
the PDB, so that the output says:
In 0.4.1-stable (for 10.1):
In 0.5.0a-stable:
In current-stable:
In current-unstable:
Only a minor thing: I would change
At 15:00 Uhr -0500 28.11.2002, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Hi David,
I like the idea of signature verification. Better safe now than sorry later.
I have a few concerns:
- Scripts on the server which automatically sign committed info and
patch files wouldn't stop a hacker, no?
In fact automatic signi
At 10:55 Uhr +0100 08.12.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
In the package database on the fink web site, there are still
package descriptions for xfree86-rootless and xfree86-server,
although these packages are marked as "Not present" in all
distributions.
I don't know if there exist other descript
On Saturday, Dec 7, 2002, at 15:27 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of trying to pass the compiler make flag into make itself --
something that just about every planet on the package has a note in
the README of 'you can try parallel make if you want, but if it
breaks, turn it off'--
Very strange, the PDB is now only showing packages that are NOT in the
10.2 tree - ie, the same packages that are on my "not yet moved" list
like yorick, r-recommended, gnupg-egd. It is not showing any package
that is in both trees.
Max will you have time to update the PDB for 0.5.0a?
-Ben
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 01:55 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
In the package database on the fink web site, there are still package descriptions for xfree86-rootless and xfree86-server, although these packages are marked as "Not present" in all distributions.
I don't know if there exist othe
I propose that, for the next six months or so, we add a fourth listing
to
the PDB, so that the output says:
In 0.4.1-stable (for 10.1):
In 0.5.0a-stable:
In current-stable:
In current-unstable:
Only a minor thing: I would change the second line to:
In 0.5.0a-stable (for 10.2):
But other
I propose that, for the next six months or so, we add a fourth listing to
the PDB, so that the output says:
In 0.4.1-stable (for 10.1):
In 0.5.0a-stable:
In current-stable:
In current-unstable:
(and of course the 0.5.0a line will change from time to time as new releases
are made).
I did
I'd like to appeal to you clever guys, in particular the kde wizards, to
help me with the Scribus package. I have spent quite some time on this
package, but it is now clear it is too big a fish for my modest
knowledge of c++, libtool, qt, darwin bundles and all that.
Scribus is a page layout pr
In the package database on the fink web site, there are still package
descriptions for xfree86-rootless and xfree86-server, although these
packages are marked as "Not present" in all distributions.
I don't know if there exist other descriptions of "not present"
packages, but these two are confu
18 matches
Mail list logo
