Sorry I spammed everyone with this and then worked out the problem
myself, but if it saves anyone else a headache, apparently the new
tcktk update broke python and a bunch of other stuff that depended on
the dynamic library with the version number explicit. I forced a
rebuild of python and now
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 08:24 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
rpl
Sounds like we can distribute rpl as a binary. Besides the author of
rpl is a fink user. :)
~ 153 % rpl -L
rpl 1.4.0 by Joe Laffey, LAFFEY Computer Imaging.
Visit http:
Hi:
I'm getting a runtime failure with a number of programs that depend upon Tkinter. For example, here is what happens when I run the
demos for PMW:
% python All.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "All.py", line 7, in ?
import Tkinter
File "/sw/lib/python2.2/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 35,
George Agnelli wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to get LCDProc to compile on 10.1.5 but I'm getting the
following when I run make. Any ideas?
[]
chrono.c:35: `SYS_NMLN' undeclared here (not in a function)
On Linux, SYS_NMLN is defined in /usr/include/sys/utsname.h:
# define SYS_NMLN _UTSNAME_LENGTH
i agree it shoudl use fink's popt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>id3lib3.7-dev is installing popt.h, which is part of the popt package.
>It should get deleted, or even better, id3lib should probably be made to
>build against the popt fink package instead...
-=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett
-=[JFH] Rende
Hi all, I'm trying to get LCDProc to compile on 10.1.5 but I'm getting the
following when I run make. Any ideas?
make all-recursive
Making all in shared
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
Making all in clients
Making all in examples
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
Making all in headlin
id3lib3.7-dev is installing popt.h, which is part of the popt package.
It should get deleted, or even better, id3lib should probably be made to
build against the popt fink package instead...
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
W
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:46, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Hi Folks.
>
> I'd like to add to the Fink website a brief explanation that a small number
> of the 0.5.0a-stable packages can not be distributed in binary form, and
> that users who want them should consult the license first and then compile
Just for reference: the current list of packages which are stable in 0.5.0a
but not included in the binary distribution is:
analog
file
freetype-hinting-bin
freetype-hinting-shlibs
freetype-hinting
fvwm-icons
host
hx
mpg123
pdflib
pdflib-shlibs
pine
pine-ssl
povray
revtex
rpl
tetex-macosx
tetex-te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
snip>
In this regard, mpg123 is tagged as Restrictive (which it is) and so
doesn't make it to the binary distribution whereas the License says :
Here are some comments on this topic from our in house lawyer.
The software may not be sold for
Le mardi, 10 déc 2002, à 16:14 Europe/Paris, David R. Morrison a écrit :
One of the main themes of the Fink project is careful respect for the
licenses which software developers include with their code. Most Fink
packages are based on software with one of the "open source" licenses
which explic
One of the main themes of the Fink project is careful respect for the
licenses which software developers include with their code. Most Fink
packages are based on software with one of the "open source" licenses
which explicitly allow distribution in binary form (sometimes with the
requirement that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Dienstag, Dezember 10, 2002, at 03:46 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote:
Hi Folks.
I'd like to add to the Fink website a brief explanation that a small
number
of the 0.5.0a-stable packages can not be distributed in binary form,
and
that users
>From PkgVersion.pm:
### binary package finding
sub find_debfile {
my $self = shift;
my ($path, $fn);
foreach $path (@{$self->{_debpaths}}, "$basepath/fink/debs") {
$fn = $path."/".$self->{_debname};
if (-f $fn) {
return $fn;
}
}
return undef;
}
So... in addition to
Hi Folks.
I'd like to add to the Fink website a brief explanation that a small number
of the 0.5.0a-stable packages can not be distributed in binary form, and
that users who want them should consult the license first and then compile
them from source if they are eligible to do so. This would incl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hallo fellows. I would like to release the following text to the bigger
websites:
I know that is sounds rather awkward, but since I really have nothing
to write about I had to come up with something, please do correct it.
Thanks
-
Since I did non of the work for 0.5.0a, I am forwarding this to the
people who deserve it :-)
Personally, I am very glad to hear you appreciate Fink so much,
Jordi. Thanks for the heads up!
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:08:59 +0700
From: Jordi Carrasco-Munoz <[EMAIL
17 matches
Mail list logo
