[Fink-devel] Deprecating Postfix-release

2003-01-02 Thread Daniel Parks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I want to make the postfix package track releases and deprecate postfix-release. There are a couple of problems with this, which I've already mailed the list about (Upgrading postfix): 1) postfix uses MMDD versioning schemes, but the

Re: [Fink-devel] Deprecating Postfix-release

2003-01-02 Thread David R. Morrison
Daniel Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I want to make the postfix package track releases and deprecate postfix-release. There are a couple of problems with this, which I've already mailed the list about (Upgrading postfix): 1) postfix uses MMDD versioning schemes, but the

Re: [Fink-devel] Deprecating Postfix-release

2003-01-02 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Parks) wrote : Solution 2: Update it to an empty package the mails root about it being deprecated in PostInstScript. Solution 3: ??? Comments? I prefer the second solution for problem two, since it will result in more people upgrading right away. Don't forget

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems with net-snmp and netinet headers in 10.2.3

2003-01-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Wednesday, Jan 1, 2003, at 20:08 US/Eastern, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, Justin Hallett alerted me to the fact that many of the headers (all?) that were missing in 10.2 have been added to 10.2.3, so that the jaguar-missing-headers package is no longer needed. I tried recompiling

Re: [Fink-devel] A note to the perl module maintainers

2003-01-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Thursday, Jan 2, 2003, at 02:30 US/Eastern, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: I subscribed myself to the cpan update list and boy, does it have a lot of traffic. I figured out how to filter on the subject line, and I'm bouncing messages for all of thesin's modules over to him. I'm just using a

Re: [Fink-devel] Dec 2002 Dev Tools not installed ...

2003-01-02 Thread Kow K
No, not. I don't think the solution needs to be so general. Isn't it sufficient to just add a conditional prompt invoked by qt3 installation as a *temporary* work around? Kow On Thursday, Jan 2, 2003, at 19:59 US/Pacific, Ben Hines wrote: On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 07:35 PM, Kow K

Re: [Fink-devel] Dec 2002 Dev Tools not installed ...

2003-01-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 11:04 PM, Kow K wrote: No, not. I don't think the solution needs to be so general. Isn't it sufficient to just add a conditional prompt invoked by qt3 installation as a *temporary* work around? The error you saw was the earliest the qt3 package has a chance

[Fink-devel] Dec 2002 Dev Tools not installed ...

2003-01-02 Thread Kow K
Hi, I'm reporting a minor problem and going to make a suggestion. I was in the process of fink update-all with CVS enabled (10.2.3). The update process stopped with Qt compilation, leaving the following message: [snipped] *** ERROR *** ERROR *** ERROR *** ERROR *** ERROR *** This package