2) Apps can't be moved any more readily than, say, /sw/bin/python or
/sw/share/doc/apache. Same goes for frameworks.
What do you mean?
You can pick up any application in /Applications and stick it somewhere
else and it works just as well. I can pick up my Mozilla.app and move
it to another m
On Wednesday, Jan 8, 2003, at 14:33 US/Eastern,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't generally accept bundled .apps in fink, because they can be
moved by the user, and also to keep fink focused.
I know this has gone around before... but, to flog a dead horse a bit
more because this has really star
Has anybody worked on a gpsdrive package? If not, I'm interested in
making my port work under Fink.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Chris Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Jan 11, 2003 21:23:27 US/Central
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GpsDrive working under Mac OS X!
Hi All,
I'm not sure
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 07:00 PM, Vadim Zaliva wrote:
zembla /Users/lord/src/fwbuilder/src/ipt> ./fwb_iptdyld: ./fwb_ipt
Undefined symbols:
__ZNSs4_Rep11_S_terminalE
__ZSt4cerr
__ZSt4cout
Well, the time I saw something like this, it was something that was
some library I was linking a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, Jan 10, 2003, at 23:20 US/Eastern, Jim White wrote:
I got in touch with my friend Andeas Fink, long time owner of the
fink.org domain. He is an even longer time Mac user and is willing to
provide DNS for a host in the fink.org domain w
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 12:13 am, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
Setting up kdelibs3-shlibs (3.1-1) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of kdelibs3-dev:
kdelibs3-dev depends on kdelibs3 (>= 3.1-1); however:
Version of kdelibs3 on system is 3.0.7-3.
dpkg: error processing kdelib
Setting up kdelibs3-shlibs (3.1-1) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of kdelibs3-dev:
kdelibs3-dev depends on kdelibs3 (>= 3.1-1); however:
Version of kdelibs3 on system is 3.0.7-3.
dpkg: error processing kdelibs3-dev (--install):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
eh
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:19 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
There is no problem there. Those are all harmless warnings, your link
was successful as you can see.
well, it still does not starts anyway:
zembla /Users/lord/src/fwbuilder/src/ipt> ./fwb_iptdyld: ./fwb_ipt
Undefined symbols:
__ZNS
ccache g++-o fwb_ipt ipt.o combinedAddress.o
PolicyCompiler_ipt.o PolicyCompiler_ipt_writers.o
PolicyCompiler_ipt_optimizer.o NATCompiler_ipt.o
NATCompiler_ipt_writers.o OSConfigurator_linux24.o OSData.o
-L/Users/lord/tmp/fwb/lib -L/sw/lib -lfwcompiler -lfwbuilder -lgthread
-lglib
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Vadim Zaliva wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 11:21 AM, Dustin Sias wrote:
Have you installed Developer Tools Dec 2002? I'm having similar
linking problems with sablotron.
I just updated to Dec 2002 version and in fact it made things wor
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 06:25 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
This kind of stuff usually means you're linking against some c++
library that was linked with gcc instead of g++ (or you're linking
with gcc yourself, but in this case, your example showed you were
linking with g++, so I assume
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 11:21 AM, Dustin Sias wrote:
Have you installed Developer Tools Dec 2002? I'm having similar
linking problems with sablotron.
I just updated to Dec 2002 version and in fact it made things worse:
ccache g++-o fwb_ipt ipt.o combinedAddress.o
PolicyCom
Just for the record, config.log gives a lot more information than the
screen output. It would be so much more useful if persons posted the
relevant portions of that file rather than excerpts from screen output.
Jeremy
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 04:31 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
You p
You probably need to be running the preprocessor with the -no-cpp-precomp
flag. Try setting
CPPFLAGS = -no-cpp-precomp
-- Dave
On Jan 12,2003 08:25:08 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>Hi all,
>
>I am the author of a package which uses FFTW and I OSX, I was hoping
>to u
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 09:20 PM, Jim White wrote:
I got in touch with my friend Andeas Fink, long time owner of the
fink.org domain. He is an even longer time Mac user and is willing to
provide DNS for a host in the fink.org domain with we like (except www
of course!).
Some sugges
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:00 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 11:50 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I'd like to see a new distribution every month. The current one is
already
more than a month old.
Good plan, IMO. :)
I agree. And don't bother waiting on KDE -
Please carefully follow the instructions at
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/inst-xfree86.php#apple-binary
-- Dave
On Jan 11,2003 11:14:24 -0500, Dan Sauve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>
>
>--
>Package manager version: 0.11.1
>Distribution version: 0.5.0a
>Mac OS X version: 10.2.3
>July 20
--
Package manager version: 0.11.1
Distribution version: 0.5.0a
Mac OS X version: 10.2.3
July 2002 Developer Tools
gcc version: 3.1
make version: 3.79
Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
here's what happens...
Information about 769 packages read in 0 seconds.
pkg system-xfree86 version #
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, Jan 10, 2003, at 14:47 US/Eastern, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 03:17 pm, Jared wrote:
What does Fink's daemonic package do? I'm not familiar with it.
Last i checked, it managed a load of startupitem bundles
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 05:36 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:
A new distribution sounds great! Especially since we have quite a lot
of packages moved to stable. Still not enough, but it's a start...
We should probably focus on getting the rest of these:
http://fink.sourceforge.ne
okay whats broken
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
system-xfree86
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 2280B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Get:1 http://us.dl.sourcef
__ZNSs4_Rep11_S_terminalE
__ZSt4cerr
__ZSt4cout
__ZSt4endlIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_
__ZSt5flushIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_
__ZTVN10__cxxabiv117__class_type_infoE
__ZTVN10__cxxabiv120__si_class_type_infoE
__ZTVN10__cxxabiv121__vmi_class_type_infoE
This
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:49 AM, Sjors Robroek wrote:
System-xfree86 does not install correctly. I need this package since i
installed apple's X11 implementation. Without this, i will not be able
to install other applications dependant on X11 through fink/apt-get.
apt-get gives the
A new distribution sounds great! Especially since we have quite a lot
of packages moved to stable. Still not enough, but it's a start...
I have no problems with the newest system-xfree86. Runs fine here
with MacOS X 10.2.2 and Apples X11.
Cheers, Chris.
---
David R. Morrison wrote:
[]
The one question is, is system-xfree86-4.1-4 ready for stable? We
certainly want the most updated one...
Then you might even try 4.2-5 ;-)
I haven't seen problems with it.
--
Martin
---
This SF.NET email is sp
Dear fink developers,
The version of system-xfree86 in the 0.5.0a distribution has "Maintainer:
None <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". Thus, a user who tries to
install system-xfree86 with FinkCommander (without reading all of
the instructions) and who is then nice enough to send feedback about
the problem,
Um 20:20 Uhr -0800 am 10.1.2003, Jim White schrieb:
I got in touch with my friend Andeas Fink, long time owner of the
fink.org domain. He is an even longer time Mac user and is willing
to provide DNS for a host in the fink.org domain with we like
(except www of course!).
Wow, that's great! An
Hi!
I am building packages for Firewall Builder (www.fwbuilder.org) and get
them to the stage
when they build OK on jaguar with fink. However libxml2 included there
have certain bug, which
prevents our software from working. To remedy this I decided to go
"bleeeding
edge" and to update fink to
Sjors Robroek wrote:
System-xfree86 does not install correctly.
It does. You just have to follow the instructions on the fink web site.
If you try to install an old version, it fails, of course.
--
Martin
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored
System-xfree86 does not install correctly. I need this package since i
installed apple's X11 implementation. Without this, i will not be able
to install other applications dependant on X11 through fink/apt-get.
apt-get gives the same problems.
Is there any way to 'fake' an install, like i can d
30 matches
Mail list logo
