BTW, did you notice that Apple has released the sources of their X11,
and commited to the XFree CVS ?
This could end to some interesting stuff, right ? :-)
Pejvan
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Max Horn wrote:
At 5:52 Uhr -0700 01.02.2003, jeff whitaker wrote:
Ben: Thanks for
Jeff,
What I've just done with the major teTeX upgrade is to put a lot of
Replaces and Provides lines but almost no Conflicts lines.
What this does is enables the user to upgrade without dpkg complaining.
Any file which exists in one of the old packages and also exists in
the new package is
Dear Fink folks,
Yesterday saw a major new release of teTeX, and there are new Fink packages
for this release in the unstable tree. Users should be aware that upgrading
to these new packages will require the download of 80 MB of source files,
and substantial compiling time.
If you are upgrading
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
Jeff,
What I've just done with the major teTeX upgrade is to put a lot of
Replaces and Provides lines but almost no Conflicts lines.
What this does is enables the user to upgrade without dpkg complaining.
Any file which exists in one of the old
So I've been fighting with getting OpenNMS working off-and-on since the
first release of a developer's 1.4.1 JDK. I finally got it mostly
working a couple weeks ago, but I was getting weird crashes from the
JDK after startup. OpenNMS uses JNI to talk to RRDTool for creating
graphs of network
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 09:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Yes, for system-xfree86 I guess we need to test to make sure that the
user has upgraded his or her externally installed version of things.
At some point there will also be issues related to fixing problems
created by Apple's
Well, I think that building thing two level namespace ought to be the
libtool default also, flat_namespace is needed for some things but
causes problems for many others, how about trying both by default?
cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace
-undefined suppress blah
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 12:01 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace
-undefined suppress blah
1. libkdeui's LIBADD is -lkdecore
2. the first half of the link complains that -lqt-mt is indirectly
referenced
3. it builds the library
Hi Dave,
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 05:23 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Dear Fink folks,
Yesterday saw a major new release of teTeX, and there are new Fink
packages
for this release in the unstable tree. Users should be aware that
upgrading
to these new packages will require the
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your quick update. One more package depends on carlisle:
pdfscreen. This package can be removed without further dependencies. Is
this package included in the new tetex, too?
The package tetex-texmf produces one warning concerning a not empty
directory while replacing
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:23:04AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 12:01 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace
-undefined suppress blah
1. libkdeui's LIBADD is -lkdecore
2. the first half of the link
David == David R Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David If you are upgrading from a previous teTeX installation on
David Fink, you will most likely need to reinstall one of the
David packages in the middle of the upgrade. There is a warning
David message which tells you what to do, when this
Randal == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Randal You didn't mention that bundle-tetex is now severely broken. It is.
Randal It wants to install things that aren't provided by tetex-base, except
Randal that they are, and so it tries to install the old version of
Randal dvi-something
13 matches
Mail list logo
