[Fink-devel] system-xfree86-4.2-1

For the first thank you for doing excellent work with Fink. I have this problem (and possibly a confusion) with system-xfree86. I have installed Apple X11 (beta 2) and if I'm right I need to install system-xfree86 to tell fink that X11 is installed. The installation fails. I can install

[Fink-devel] emacs-20.7-5

... crashes with: ** Date/Time: 2003-01-21 11:28:01 +0100 OS Version: 10.2.3 (Build 6G30) Host: stardust.micromata.priv Command:emacs PID:897 Exception: EXC_BREAKPOINT (0x0006) Code[0]:0x0001Code[1]:0x8fe01280 Thread 0 Crashed: #0 0x8fe01280 in halt

Re: [Fink-devel] system-xfree86-4.2-1

Jari Perttunen wrote: [] pkg system-xfree86 version 4.2-1 Too old. Get version 4.2-5. -- Martin --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com

Re: [Fink-devel] emacs-20.7-5

You are trying to use fink distribution 0.4.0 with OS X 10.2. You need to upgrade your Fink to a 10.2-compatible version (0.5.0a or later). -- Dave --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =

[Fink-devel] announcement?

I was thinking it would be good to announce the new version of FinkCommander in Fink's news section. (Note that 2/3 of our news items these days have to do with other people's products: X11.app, Virex, etc., so this would continue the trend of alerting Fink users to interesting developments.)

[Fink-devel] oaf dependency cleanup

I removed popt, which declares BuildDependsOnly: True, from Depends line of oaf. At the sametime, I added popt to BuildDepends line of following packages: anjuta0.9.99-3 eroaster 2.0.12-2 evolution 1.2.2-2 galeon1.2.6-2 glunarclock 0.24.1-2 gnucash 1.8.0-2

[Fink-devel] (no subject)

Hi developers, I have been using a modified Gtk+2 build, set to depend on libpng3, to run ROX Filer and everything works fine - should the dependencies on gtk+2 and gtk-engines be changed to reflect the upgrade to libpng3? Regards, - Michel Public key:

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 and gtk-engines still depend on libpng

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi developers, (ps sorry for the previous message that was sent accidentally subject-less) I have been using a modified Gtk+2 build, set to depend on libpng3, to run ROX Filer and everything works fine - should the dependencies on gtk+2 and

[Fink-devel] Two questions about GSL.

Here are two questions about GSL (Gnu Scientific Library) package: 1) I haven't been able to run make check successfully, even if I've already installed Dec02 Dev update (still get internal compiler error)? Any hint about this issue? 2) Would I gain any performance improvement recompiling them

[Fink-devel] Developers committing to stable? What about binaries?

Hi All, I received positive feedback for a few of my packages. Since I have CVS access, should I just commit them to the stable tree myself? (As opposed to non-developers who would submit a please move my package to stable request on the SF tracker.) Then, should I explicitly notify someone

Re: [Fink-devel] Developers committing to stable? What about binaries?

On Feb 12,2003 14:47:14 -0500, Carsten Klapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Hi All, I received positive feedback for a few of my packages. Since I have CVS access, should I just commit them to the stable tree myself? (As opposed to non-developers who would submit a please move my package to

Re: [Fink-devel] oaf dependency cleanup

At 23:25 Uhr +0900 12.02.2003, Masanori Sekino wrote: I removed popt, which declares BuildDependsOnly: True, from Depends line of oaf. At the sametime, I added popt to BuildDepends line of following packages: anjuta0.9.99-3 eroaster 2.0.12-2 evolution 1.2.2-2 galeon

[Fink-devel] A New Guy, asking about porting and maintaining simple packages

Hello. I come to fink from a BSD-style ports background. There are lots of simple packages in the BSD ports tree, packages which don't do anything other than a vanilla fetch, make, and make install. What's the fink take on these kinds of simple packages? Would it be useful for me to package

Re: [Fink-devel] A New Guy, asking about porting and maintaining simple packages

Hi John, Personally I'd like to see DadaDodo in Fink. (You may remember me from such silly Fink packages as funny-manpages and wtf. ;) ). My take on this issue is people use Fink because they don't want to (or don't know how to) compile/install/remove unix-ish software on their own, so

Re: [Fink-devel] Prebinding

I've had some experience with this, trying to get the oss tuxracer to stop crashing under certain conditions. Here are my 2 cents: 1. If one application wants to be prebound, all of its libraries and dependencies must be compiled prebound. That means X11, qt3, and everything elseif you're

[Fink-devel] /sw not in path with Apple's X11

Hi, I am a total newbie with X11. Is there a way to permanently tell Apple's X11 to append Fink's /sw in its PATH? I didn't see any info yet on the fink web site how to do this. This is required for example to run xboard together with gnuchess. One can launch xboard easily enough by adding

[Fink-devel] Re: /sw not in path with Apple's X11

From my experience, any commands in ~/.xinitrc affect the entire X session. This is what my .xinitrc looks like: source /sw/bin/init.sh source ~/.bash_profile xmodmap -e keysym 59 = Delete autocutsel exec quartz-wm What it does is run the Fink path-fix script, loads my local bash settings,

[Fink-devel] -force_flat_namespace and Apple's libGL

THANK YOU! Not knowing this just cost about 48 hours of my life in trying to get another program I am trying to prepare for fink to compile. It seems that with Apple's libGL, you cannot use -force_flat_namespace any more, because the libGL.dylib in /usr/X11R6/lib loads the one in the OpenGL