Re: [Fink-devel] Re: doxygen

2003-02-24 Thread Justin Hallett
on my Ti ( main install pdflatex is in tetex-base) but I just tried to build doxygen on my build box which is building everything from scratch and it seems pdflatex isn't in tetex-nox which is what I thought the problem was, just it's not in tetex-base which I had installed this time and got to sam

[Fink-devel] Re: doxygen

2003-02-24 Thread Justin Hallett
I figured out that pdflatex is in tetex-base and not tetex-nox, so doxygen needs to depend on -base it seems though this could be a tetex issue so I'll cross post this to the devel list as well. Justin Hallett writes: >Hi I'm checking all the depends in unstable, and I found an issue with >doxygen

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome-vfs dependencies

2003-02-24 Thread Masanori Sekino
On 2003.2.22, at 08:33 AM, Max Horn wrote: I wonder, are these BuildDepends in gnome-vfs (and gnome-vfs-ssl) really necessary? Nope, I'll fix it when I found time. BuildDepends: pkgconfig, gtk-doc (>= 0.9-4), libjpeg, libpng, libtiff, netpbm, audiofile, db3 (>= 3.3.11-8), esound, glib, orbit-d

[Fink-devel] gs 8 (Was: Re: [Fink-users] system-ghostscript question)

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: [] If so, then you might want to use fink's ghostscript. Fink has had ghostscript 8 in it's unstable tree since late November. There have been some problems detected with ghostscript 8 in the past few weeks, involving loading images of types other than .eps. While we are