Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree; legal issues

2003-03-22 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 03:40 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: To summarize, I believe a separate crypto tree is still useful in Fink. Even if Apple has purchased a licence or permit to distribute openssl along with Mac OS X, for example, in Russia, I'm pretty sure that permit would not automa

Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree; legal issues

2003-03-22 Thread Carsten Klapp
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 03:33 pm, Max Horn wrote: I'd be interested to know: does Apple ship this with all version of Mac OS X in the whole world (I seriously don' know, this not a flame bait). Neither you nor me probably know this, since we both are in countries which are not affected

[Fink-devel] crypto tree; legal issues

2003-03-22 Thread Max Horn
Changing the subject line as this is now really a different discussion. Ben suggested that we abolish the crypto/ tree. Disclaimer: I didn't originally invent the crypto/ tree thingy, it was there before I even joined Fink. Also note that for me, and also for Ben Hines, there are no legal issue

[Fink-devel] python and crypto

2003-03-22 Thread chixson
Not that I'm a core developer or anything, but it seems that python 2.2 linked against ssl as well, and there was never any controversy about it. I guess I don't understand why it's become an issue now. [fourshadows:lib/python2.2/lib-dynload] chixson% pwd /sw/lib/python2.2/lib-dynload [fourshad

Re: [Fink-devel] python and crypto

2003-03-22 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 09:21 AM, Max Horn wrote: Am Samstag, 22.03.03 um 02:46 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines: On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 10:50 AM, Max Horn wrote: I guess that would amount to having python, python-ssl, python-nox and python-nox-sll. Furthermore, there are the 21, 22 and 2

Re: [Fink-devel] python and crypto

2003-03-22 Thread chixson
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, David R. Morrison wrote: > > Somewhere in the 2.x releases, python picked up ssl socket support, > > Do you know if there is any way to disable this? Well, I've not had time to test anything but here are some ideas: try configuring with: ./configure --without-ssl I'm no

Re: [Fink-devel] python and crypto

2003-03-22 Thread David R. Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Somewhere in the 2.x releases, python picked up ssl socket support, > located in: > > /sw/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/_ssl.so > > At the very least, this library links against openssl. > Others might, but I'm not aware of them. Do you know if there is any way to disabl

Re: [Fink-devel] python and crypto

2003-03-22 Thread chixson
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, David R. Morrison wrote: > BTW, I can't figure out why python has an openssl dependency at all. > Neither the binaries nor the library are linked to the openssl lib. > > Still checking into this... Somewhere in the 2.x releases, python picked up ssl socket support, locate

Re: [Fink-devel] python and crypto

2003-03-22 Thread David R. Morrison
BTW, I can't figure out why python has an openssl dependency at all. Neither the binaries nor the library are linked to the openssl lib. Still checking into this... -- Dave --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!

Re: [Fink-devel] Distfile mirroring and how to bring Fink and Opendarwin closer together.

2003-03-22 Thread Max Horn
Am Samstag, 22.03.03 um 02:52 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines: On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 06:48 AM, David wrote: There are a few issues which need to be addressed, mainly a few alterations to the fink code that have to be carefully discussed. I cannot really decide on them, nor do I know what exactly

Re: [Fink-devel] python and crypto

2003-03-22 Thread Max Horn
Am Samstag, 22.03.03 um 02:46 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines: On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 10:50 AM, Max Horn wrote: I guess that would amount to having python, python-ssl, python-nox and python-nox-sll. Furthermore, there are the 21, 22 and 23 versions of it, for a total of 12 packages (not counting

Re: [Fink-devel] Distfile mirroring and how to bring Fink and Opendarwin closer together.

2003-03-22 Thread David R. Morrison
Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks. landonf, bbraun and I have already started to discuss this, > > and I > > also discussed it briefly with Max on IRC last night. > > > Well, i hope you didn't discuss reimplementing what i already did. > > -Ben > Nope. We're discussing how to