Re: glut license (was Re: [Fink-devel] MD5)

2003-04-01 Thread Max Horn
Am Dienstag, 01.04.03 um 03:49 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines: On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 05:33 PM, Matt Stephenson wrote: On Tuesday, Apr 1, 2003, at 11:17 Australia/Sydney, Ben Hines wrote: On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 02:16 AM, Matt Stephenson wrote: I tend towards 'Restrictive/Distributable'

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Requiring MD5s

2003-04-01 Thread Max Horn
Am Dienstag, 01.04.03 um 08:27 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines: On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 10:16 PM, Ben Hines wrote: For the mirroring setup with opendarwin we are going to need MD5s for all packages. I'm going to make fink refuse to unpack packages with no MD5 specified. It has been a warning in

Re: glut license (was Re: [Fink-devel] MD5)

2003-04-01 Thread David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Dienstag, April 1, 2003, at 03:49 Uhr, Ben Hines wrote: snip distribution is allowed without license. To cut things short. I ran this by our lawyers and here is what they said: This type of license indicates that you may distribute the

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Requiring MD5s

2003-04-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Here is the relevant discussion from #fink (edited, times in JST). Apr 01 13:42:47 Clef anyone object to requiring md5s for all packages? Apr 01 13:42:49 Clef no? good Apr 01 14:07:37 pogma Clef: What do you mean requiring? Apr 01 14:08:32 pogma Clef: If you mean that the package will not build

[Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread David R. Morrison
Hello. Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace. The new versions are all in the unstable tree. It would be particularly useful to know that gnuplot-py, octave, and siag work correctly with the new version of gnuplot. The change which was

Re: [Fink-devel] Requiring MD5s

2003-04-01 Thread Charles Lepple
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 01:16 AM, Ben Hines wrote: It has been a warning in validate for a while. just stumbled across this in the fink manpage. This would be a good thing to add to the porting guide. -- Charles Lepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ghz.cc/charles/

Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: Hello. Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace. The new versions are all in the unstable tree. It would be particularly useful to know that gnuplot-py, octave, and siag work correctly with the new version of

Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread David R. Morrison
On Apr 2,2003 00:38:09 +0200, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : David R. Morrison wrote: Hello. Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace. The new versions are all in the unstable tree. It would be particularly useful to know

Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread Max Horn
With your latest gnuplot, I got: ... Enable generation of PDF files ... So it *seems* PDF support is built properly now. Also the bogus pdflib.dylib symlink is not present. Cheers, Max --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:

[Fink-devel] Fwd: [Fink-users] AM_PATH_GTKGL trouble

2003-04-01 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
forwarded from fink-users: Begin forwarded message: From: Jonathan Brandmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Apr 1, 2003 7:16:57 PM US/Eastern To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fink-users] AM_PATH_GTKGL trouble I am a developer for a python extension module project. We are trying to support OSX

[Fink-devel] Newbie: Package maintenance and bringing GNOME up to speed

2003-04-01 Thread Tony Arnold
Hi all, I've been a long time fink user, but only recently have my skills come up to a level where I would feel comfortable offering help. I have spent some time over the last few days bringing some of the core dependencies for GNOME 2.2.1 up to their relevant releases on my machine, and