[Fink-devel] hx package

2004-12-31 Thread David R. Morrison
We have a package called hx. It is a restrictive package, so we don't store the source at distfiles. It no longer has a maintainer, the URL for the source does not resolve, and the URL for the homepage does not resolve. Unless someone has an idea for resurrecting this package, I plan to remove

Re: [Fink-devel] hx package

2004-12-31 Thread Peter O'Gorman
David R. Morrison wrote: We have a package called hx. It is a restrictive package, so we don't store the source at distfiles. It no longer has a maintainer, the URL for the source does not resolve, and the URL for the homepage does not resolve. Unless someone has an idea for resurrecting this

Re: [Fink-devel] hx package

2004-12-31 Thread David R. Morrison
Well, it shouldn't be! (Unless the label of Restrictive is incorrect...) -- Dave On Dec 31, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: David R. Morrison wrote: We have a package called hx. It is a restrictive package, so we don't store the source at distfiles. It no longer has a maintainer,

Re: [Fink-devel] hx package

2004-12-31 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Dec 31, 2004, at 2:02 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Well, it shouldn't be! (Unless the label of Restrictive is incorrect...) According to the README in the source that can be downloaded from here: http://hotlinex.sourceforge.net/ the licence seems to be GPL. Unless that's a different project.

Re: [Fink-devel] hx package

2004-12-31 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Koen van der Drift wrote: the licence seems to be GPL. Unless that's a different project. I think it is the same project, but for the version in Fink, the file COPYING says: THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF LICENSE Version 31337, December 29, 2001 Err,

Re: [Fink-devel] hx package

2004-12-31 Thread David R. Morrison
Thanks, Koen, well-spotted. I believe that the package was Restrictive because of some patent issue or something... we'll have to check it out. -- Dave On Dec 31, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Dec 31, 2004, at 2:02 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Well, it shouldn't be! (Unless

[Fink-devel] update gnu sed package?

2004-12-31 Thread Lars Rosengreen
The GNU sed package in fink is currently at version 4.1. There is a problem with the -i command line option screwing up permissions: ~% echo 'sed is good' test ; ls -l test ; sed -i 's/good/bad/' test ; ls -l test -rw-r--r--1 lars lars 12 Dec 31 11:43 test -rw---1

Bug#19: [Fink-devel] Bug#19: Doesn't seem to build

2004-12-31 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: Package: xxdiff Version: 3.1-1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source I get the following (10.3.7, XCode 1.5 w/November 2004 update): c++ -c -I/sw/include/qt -I. -I/sw/include -o resParser.o resParser.cpp In file included from resParser.cpp:813: