Well, it took a little longer than I'd hoped, but I just sent this message
to gcc-patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00439.html
which solves the issue for me. The bug has been reopened and is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18810.
Jeff, could you please apply the patch in that mail
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Well, it took a little longer than I'd hoped, but I just sent this
message to gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00439.html which solves
the issue for me. The bug has been reopened and is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18810.
Jeff, could you please apply
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Thanks Peter! That's quite a sleuthing job ..
If I were smarter I'd have found it sooner :)
I've updated g95 to use this patch, and am working on a new gfortran
which uses this and your two-level namespace patch. Perhaps I'll make a
gcc4 package a splitoff of gfortran -
The deb contents database is pretty much ready for basic testing, see
the patch here:
experimental/benh57/fink/Reporting.pm
experimental/benh57/fink/reporting.patch
Folks are wondering why i don't make it live. I do want to put it into
CVS, HEAD actually, but since 24 is imminent it does make
