In order for the build of ethereal-ssl to find GTK+2, I had to manually
install:
pango1-xft2-dev
atk1
I suspect gtk+2-dev should depend on these. Otherwise:
pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0
fails, complaining about those two packages missing. Which makes
ethereal's
the home page information is not valid anymore, unable
to access.
installation current but no idea how to run the program!
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
In order for the build of ethereal-ssl to find GTK+2, I had to manually
install:
pango1-xft2-dev
atk1
I suspect gtk+2-dev should depend on these. Otherwise:
gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything. It has, however, in its
description the lines:
Any
Martin Costabel wrote:
gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything.
A quick check didn't show anything in fink packaging policy about -dev
packages not being able to depend on anything, and indeed gtk+2-dev does
depend on things:
Depends: gtk+2-shlibs (= 2.4.9-8), gtk+2 (= 2.4.9-8), darwin (= 8-1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
| Martin Costabel wrote:
|
|gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything.
|
|
| A quick check didn't show anything in fink packaging policy about -dev
| packages not being able to depend on anything, and indeed gtk+2-dev does
|
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything.
A quick check didn't show anything in fink packaging policy about -dev
packages not being able to depend on anything, and indeed gtk+2-dev does
depend on things:
Depends: gtk+2-shlibs (= 2.4.9-8), gtk+2 (=
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but that really sounds rather
| backwards...
Yes there is a good reason. Think for a second and you'll realize what it
is Packages which are Build Depends Only can not depend on other,
unrelated, packages.
It is
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[]
It is erfectly fine for them to depend on their own
shared libraries etc, it is required, in fact. But if it were to depend on,
for example glib2, then it would be impossible for another package to
BuildDepend on glib without a BuildConflicts on
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol ___eprintf
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a(_eprintf.o) private
external definition of ___eprintf in section (__TEXT,__text)
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libstdc++.dylib(single module)
On May 7, 2005, at 12:39, Martin Costabel wrote:
glib and glib2 are not good examples; they are compatible. But
there are many *-dev packages that conflict with and replace other
*-dev packages and are to be freely swapped in and out during
package building. If any other package had a
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
[]
I'm rather curios why you'd want a IneheritedBuildDepends instead of
just fixing the Depends handling --- because, currently, the installed
gtk+2-dev is very much broken[0], and IneheritedBuildDepends (guessing
from the name) won't fix that.
There is nothing
Hi, despite having (as the FAQ suggests) reinstalled the latest
Developer Tools from Xcode2 (including the 10.4 SDK)
I get this error trying to configure `oaf'
checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
### execution of ./configure failed,
On May 7, 2005, at 4:16 PM, John T. Hale wrote:
Hi, despite having (as the FAQ suggests) reinstalled the latest
Developer Tools from Xcode2 (including the 10.4 SDK)
I get this error trying to configure `oaf'
checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create
Sorry about the SPAM--bit of a malfunction on my part
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy
I noticed today that darcs has no maintainer.
Anybody mind if I adopt it?
crh
pgpo9wFjbvroO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
X-OpenPGP Key Fingerprint for Benn Newman: 8738 9074 7446 7DEC 2E67 0685 144E
B994 F47C C6B1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary=nextPart1202670.oMBSj4l3At;
protocol=application/pgp-signature;
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL
On May 7, 2005, at 2:06 PM, Corey Halpin wrote:
I noticed today that darcs has no maintainer.
Anybody mind if I adopt it?
speaking as the person who orphaned it a few months ago, go right
ahead :) there might be a newer info file in my experimental
directory, but I seem to remember there
On 2005-05-07, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
speaking as the person who orphaned it a few months ago, go right
ahead :) there might be a newer info file in my experimental
directory, but I seem to remember there being a problem with it.
Adopted now. I'll poke around in your experimental and
18 matches
Mail list logo
