On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Daniel Macks wrote:
There's a bug in ./configure or libtool that causes a fork-bomb with
fort77.
I sent a patch to the fort77 maintainer on June 3rd. I haven't
received a reply yet, does anyone object to me committing it?
It's quite non-invasive, the change is to add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Sachs wrote:
| On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Daniel Macks wrote:
|
|
| There's a bug in ./configure or libtool that causes a fork-bomb with
| fort77.
|
|
| I sent a patch to the fort77 maintainer on June 3rd. I haven't
| received a reply yet, does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Sachs wrote:
| On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Daniel Macks wrote:
|
|
| There's a bug in ./configure or libtool that causes a fork-bomb with
| fort77.
|
|
| I sent a patch to the fort77 maintainer on June 3rd. I haven't
| received a reply yet, does
Hello all
I was advised by James Gibbs to post this here:
I'm a Fink user having problems using lammpi in Tiger. I'm by no means
an expert so some pointers would be greatly appreciated... I'm trying
to compile a scientific program called cmbeasy which uses lammpi. The
problem arises when doing
On Jun 17, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Micha Mutschler wrote:
[]
mlib.c: In function 'buffer_write':
mlib.c:179: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
'sprintf' differ
in signedness
mlib.c:192: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
[]
Failed: phase
On Jun 20, 2005, at 05:52, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Yes, please apply this patch to fort77 (and up the revision), the
fork bomb
Done.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:22:38AM -0700, Matthew Sachs wrote:
On Jun 20, 2005, at 05:52, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Yes, please apply this patch to fort77 (and up the revision), the
fork bomb
Done.
Excellent!
dan
--
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks
