Hi,
Just to let you all know that I asked to be removed from the core group due
to the fact that I have little or no free time to contribute there.
Thanks,
Peter
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
fro
Hi,
2005/7/31, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've got a public-ish wiki set up at
>
> http://ldx3.psfc.mit.edu:2500/
> (email me for the password)
Give me access. give me!
> The purpose of this site is to provide a readily-available place to jot down
> things that may need to go into
Several packages (at least libgnomeprint2, vte, librsvg2) have recently
been reported not to build because of the error mentioned in the
subject. This is caused by a bug in gtk-doc version 1.3. I have
committed a fix to cvs and mention this only for the record (to
fink-devel as the "maintainer"
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2005, at 7:21 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> >Fink is not (!) supposed to be a test-bed for an unreleased
> >compiler. It is easy enough to build gcc from cvs.
>
> Yes, exactly. Fink is a distribution, not a testing system.
On Jul 30, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:IMO we shouldn't have 'bar' provide 'foo' as well as have a separate 'foo' package. This is a continual source of chaos. There are many many packages right now that do this. Major reasons are: variants/ssl, old packages that used to be separate
