I sent this message to the lua package maintainer:
"
I worked all night on problems porting an app to OSX, that relies on
lua and in the end it turned out that the problem was that fink did
not install lua-shlibs when installing lua. Installing them fixed the
problem right away
To avoid ot
> "Dave" == Dave Vasilevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> What version of Fink are you running? Unreleased versions from CVS
Dave> have a known issue with FinkCommander updating the table extremely
Dave> slowly. There's a fix for this in FinkCommander CVS.
Package manager version: 0.24.10
On Dec 7, 2005, at 6:04 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Or is it something peculiar to me that keeps it saying "updating
the table data" with a barber pole forever?
Randal,
What version of Fink are you running? Unreleased versions from CVS
have a known issue with FinkCommander updating the ta
Hello,
I'm interested in running dbmail on osx.
I have no experience creating a fink package and before I dig in I
just wanted to know if
anyone has, or is working on, a dbmail package?
Looks like a pretty minor fix, it needs to use gmake and it needs
crypt.h. I changed the reference
to cr
Dear Jeff et al:
To get pgplot to compile on 10.4, I had to change
%p/share/aquaterm/%N
to
%p/share/aquaterm/adapters/%N
and removed -lcc_dynamic from the patch file (with this in the
linking fails but a broken fink package still builds, so it is hard
to catch).
Here are revised info an
Hi Alexander:
> Need you ask? ;-) It's unmaintained, so it's fair game.
I suspect I am the most computer illiterate of any of the maintainers, and
I don't want to mess up other people's packages, so, yes, I did want to
ask.
Anyway, grepping through the rest of the info and patch files, these we
Trevor Harmon wrote:
Why not make saxon81 and saxon82, and have them both Provide: saxon
Ah, I forgot about Provides. However, I don't see a reason to make
separate packages for saxon82, saxon83, saxon84, etc. I think I'll just
do a saxon811 and a saxon8, both of which will provide saxon. Th
On 12/7/05, William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You also need to delete -lcc_dynamic from line 46 of the patch
> script. Then it builds.
>
> Is it ok with the core people if I update these files in cvs?
>
> Bill
>
Need you ask? ;-) It's unmaintained, so it's fair game.
--
Alexander K. Han