[Fink-devel] SDL-mixer patch for fink

2006-03-10 Thread Keith Conger
Hi Max, A couple packages of mine depend on SDL_mixer so I decided to try to fix on 10.4 intel. Looks like the fixes were in SDL_mixer cvs already. So I've include a patch and update info file until there is a new upstream release. Thanks, Keith -- Keith Conger keith DOT conger AT gmail DOT com

Re: [Fink-devel] Q: policy regarding pkgconfig *.pc files?

2006-03-10 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:24:43AM -0800, Adrian Mugnolo wrote: > Is there a policy regarding pkgconfig *.pc files? > > Following the Creating Fink Packages documentation: > > - foo-shlibs > - foo > - foo-bin > - foo-dev (if option 2) > > The manual does not mention them. If included, i > would

[Fink-devel] Q: policy regarding pkgconfig *.pc files?

2006-03-10 Thread Adrian Mugnolo
Is there a policy regarding pkgconfig *.pc files? Following the Creating Fink Packages documentation: - foo-shlibs - foo - foo-bin - foo-dev (if option 2) The manual does not mention them. If included, i would put them in the foo or foo-dev packages. Is that okay? Thanks in advance.

[Fink-devel] Re: openssl patch fails -- 10.4 "untransitional"; FYI

2006-03-10 Thread Daniel E. Macks
I just fixed a syntax error in the .patch, and it now applies successfully for me. dan Neil Tiffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I don't have a 10.4 (untransitional) to test with. > > On Mar 10, 2006, at 9:53 AM, William Scott wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I just got this after a selfupdate: >> >> openss

[Fink-devel] Re: openssl patch fails -- 10.4 "untransitional"; FYI

2006-03-10 Thread Neil Tiffin
William, I don't have a 10.4 (untransitional) to test with. But, thanks. Neil On Mar 10, 2006, at 9:53 AM, William Scott wrote: Hi: I just got this after a selfupdate: openssl-0.9.7i/VMS/VMSify-conf.pl patch -p1 patch: malformed patch at line 50: diff -ru openssl-0.9.7i/ Configure op