Jeff,
I figured out the g++ regressions I have been suffering with gcc
trunk built as a fink package. The problem is in PR 26792...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26792
and can be solved simply by adding...
NoSetMACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET: True
...to gcc4.info. You will also want
On 6/7/06, Venkatesh Prasad Ranganath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build getoptbin-1.1.4-2 from the unstable branch on a Mac
> Intel and I get the following error
>
> The following package will be installed or updated:
> getoptbin
> dpkg-deb -b
> /sw/src/fink.build/root-fink-buildl
I'm trying to build getoptbin-1.1.4-2 from the unstable branch on a Mac Intel and I get the following error The following package will be installed or updated: getoptbindpkg-deb -b /sw/src/fink.build/root-fink-buildlock-getoptbin-1.1.4-2 /sw/src/fink.builddpkg-deb: building package `fink-buildlock-
JF,
I checked it with some echo statements in the compile
script. The only set in fink for the gcc4 build is
SetMACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET. I've added...
NoSetMACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET: True
to gcc4.info and will try a build of tonight's gcc trunk.
Hopefully this is the source of the g++ regressi
On 08 Jun 2006, at 02:03, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> Doesn' t "fink duminfo" show you those exactly ?
Sorry : dumpinfo
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
On 08 Jun 2006, at 01:54, Jack Howarth wrote:
> ... how fink sets MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET as well as CFLAGS,
> CXXFLAGS, and LDFLAGS. Does anyone know what environmentals are
> preset in 10.4 unstable fink during builds?
Doesn' t "fink duminfo" show you those exactly ?
JF Mertens
___
I am going to take another stab at figuring out the g++
regressions in gcc trunk when built as a fink package tonight.
As I mentioned before, with the stock bison 1.28 in Tiger or
bison 2.3, I can build gcc trunk manually and it passes the
c++ testsuite fine. However so far I am finding that wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Erwin wrote:
> Is it possible to have multiple installations of X on the same
> machine? I'm trying to port a series of libraries and programs
> (nomachine's nx stuff) that, among other nasty things, patches Xlib.
you could put your xlib so
Is it possible to have multiple installations of X on the same
machine? I'm trying to port a series of libraries and programs
(nomachine's nx stuff) that, among other nasty things, patches Xlib.
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
> Why would you think that a 2.x release series of bison wouldn't
> be backwardly compatible?
I have no idea. I am only observing that between Apple's bison and
Fink's bison, there were always some packages that only built with one
and some only with the other
Martin,
Why would you think that a 2.x release series of bison wouldn't
be backwardly compatible?
Jack
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
11 matches
Mail list logo
