On 28 Aug 2006, at 23:50, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:42:08PM -0400, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
>> On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
>>
>>> As a package maintainer I would like to see it invoked with
>>> option "-
>>> T" like "fink -KkT rebuild ." Once I figure ou
> David Fang wrote:
>
> > Don't forget the fact that test-suites can add more dependencies, e.g.
> > gcc requiring dejagnu and expect. A TestDepends/MaintainerDepends field
> > might be useful.
>
> Ooh, that's a good point. This is starting to turn into a full-blown
> Feature. :)
TestConflicts,
Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:56:52PM -0400, David Fang wrote:
>> > There are also several different standards for even what command runs
>> > the tests. I guess 'make check' is the autotools standard, but lots of
>> > auto*-using packagers don't know that and
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:56:52PM -0400, David Fang wrote:
> > There are also several different standards for even what command runs
> > the tests. I guess 'make check' is the autotools standard, but lots of
> > auto*-using packagers don't know that and have custom-written 'make
> > test'. And the
David Fang wrote:
> Don't forget the fact that test-suites can add more dependencies, e.g.
> gcc requiring dejagnu and expect. A TestDepends/MaintainerDepends field
> might be useful.
Ooh, that's a good point. This is starting to turn into a full-blown
Feature. :)
--
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. R
> There are also several different standards for even what command runs
> the tests. I guess 'make check' is the autotools standard, but lots of
> auto*-using packagers don't know that and have custom-written 'make
> test'. And the perl world long ago standardized on 'make test' (and we
> have a sp
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:42:08PM -0400, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
>
> > As a package maintainer I would like to see it invoked with option "-
> > T" like "fink -KkT rebuild ." Once I figure out how to
> > run the tests and put the instructions in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
> As a package maintainer I would like to see it invoked with option "-
> T" like "fink -KkT rebuild ." Once I figure out how to
> run the tests and put the instructions in the .info file, I can then
>
As a package maintainer I would like to see it invoked with option "-
T" like "fink -KkT rebuild ." Once I figure out how to
run the tests and put the instructions in the .info file, I can then
easily run them every time the package is upgraded. This would be a
lot simpler than having to go
On Aug 28, 2006, at 11:08, Sebastien Maret wrote:
> Matthew Sachs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If a significant number of packages have [test suites], perhaps
>> it's worth
>> adding a way to specify it in the .info file (CheckScript?) . I
>> could implement that feature and hook into it in
Hello, I found that Mac OS X Fink port os mldonkey is
not up to date. Can any of your performs this update.
http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/mldonkey
Greetings.
__
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y
Matthew Sachs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How many of you have packages which have test suites ("make check",
> for instance) which it would be useful to run as part of the
> buildfink build?
>
> I know gmp has one which I'm often asked to run.
>
> If a significant number of packages have th
12 matches
Mail list logo
