Re: [Fink-devel] OSX 10.3.9 Python

2006-12-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 12/22/06, Murali Vadivelu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Wayne, > > Can you 'locate' ccpnmr-py.info file and check whether Type: says > '(2.3 2.4)', please? It is possible that Fink maintainer(s) who added > my package description file remove 2.4 by mistake because my original > info file wou

Re: [Fink-devel] OSX 10.3.9 Python

2006-12-22 Thread Murali Vadivelu
Dear Wayne, Can you 'locate' ccpnmr-py.info file and check whether Type: says '(2.3 2.4)', please? It is possible that Fink maintainer(s) who added my package description file remove 2.4 by mistake because my original info file would say 'Type: (2.3 2.4 2.5)'. Many thanks. Best regards, Mu

Re: [Fink-devel] imlib-shlibs-1.9.14-15

2006-12-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 12/20/06, Jean-Francois Sygnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -- > Package manager version: 0.25.2 > Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync i386 > Mac OS X version: 10.4.8 > Xcode version: 2.4.1 > gcc version: 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367) > make version: 3.80 > >

[Fink-devel] imlib-shlibs-1.9.14-15

2006-12-22 Thread Jean-Francois Sygnet
-- Package manager version: 0.25.2 Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync i386 Mac OS X version: 10.4.8 Xcode version: 2.4.1 gcc version: 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367) make version: 3.80 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influ

Re: [Fink-devel] OSX 10.3.9 Python

2006-12-22 Thread Wayne Boucher
Thanks, that's good to know, I'm not sure why it wasn't coming up but hopefully it will next time we try. Regards, Wayne Boucher On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 12/21/06, Murali Vadivelu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the unstable tree enabled? It is entirely possible that p

Re: [Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (>= 3.0-1)

2006-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Michèle Garoche wrote: [] > The only evidence I have for it is that it worked perfectly two days > before the changes, then did not work one day after it. So certainly > related to this change, given that I have not updated during this time. Is this the same error as seen by others: etex -in

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink errors out after "cvs up" in /sw/fink (problem scanning gmp.info)

2006-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: [] > http://www.trilug.org/~ranger/irc_logs/public/fink-2006-12-21.log > > Search for "Fingolfin" OK, so it boils down to whether the following is true or not: 14:25 < dmacks> drm: Ayup...fink (at least older versions, dunno currently) scans ConfigureParams during indexing.

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink errors out after "cvs up" in /sw/fink (problem scanning gmp.info)

2006-12-22 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Costabel wrote: >> However, IMHO discussion on IRC are a very bad way to make decissions >> about the fate of Fink. Clearly IRC is a great way to discuss these >> things raw, but it also excludes many Fink developers from the >> discussion, plu

Re: [Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (>= 3.0-1)

2006-12-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 22 déc. 2006 à 11:45, Martin Costabel a écrit :Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 18 déc. 2006 à 00:07, Tomoaki Okayama a écrit : Dear maintainers,I changed Depends: and BuildDepends: fields of following packages:* jadetex.info I'm sorry to inform you that your changes seem to have completely broken html

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink errors out after "cvs up" in /sw/fink (problem scanning gmp.info)

2006-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Max Horn wrote: > Am 22.12.2006 um 07:52 schrieb Martin Costabel: > >> Max Horn wrote: >>> For some reasons I didn't update my Fink installation for some time. >>> So today I run a "cvs up" in /sw/fink, then sudo fink list -o >>> >>> This resulted in the following error: >>> >>> Failed: Error perf

Re: [Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (>= 3.0-1)

2006-12-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 18 déc. 2006 à 00:07, Tomoaki Okayama a écrit : Dear maintainers, I changed Depends: and BuildDepends: fields of following packages: * jadetex.info I'm sorry to inform you that your changes seem to have completely broken html and pdf production of sgml based files at least when dealing

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink errors out after "cvs up" in /sw/fink (problem scanning gmp.info)

2006-12-22 Thread Max Horn
Am 22.12.2006 um 07:52 schrieb Martin Costabel: > Max Horn wrote: >> For some reasons I didn't update my Fink installation for some time. >> So today I run a "cvs up" in /sw/fink, then sudo fink list -o >> >> This resulted in the following error: >> >> Failed: Error performing percent expansion: