On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:23:42AM -0600, Neil Tiffin wrote:
>
> If I understand you correctly, I should make psycopg2 depend on
> postgresql82 and therefore it will not install with 81, 80, and 74.
> Or I have to make a separate package for each one of the other
> postgresql variations(alo
On 2/14/07, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Neil Tiffin wrote:
>
> > often. Attached is the debian control file which seems to work fine and
> > does not have all of this complexity.
>
> It would work, if "shlibs" worked on OSX, but un
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1649433&group_id=17203&atid=414256
Since I'm not currently doing anything that requires this compiler
set, I feel unqualified to be the one to adjudicate whether it gets
updated in Fink. If someone who uses it (and has a faster box than
min
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Tiffin wrote:
> often. Attached is the debian control file which seems to work fine and
> does not have all of this complexity.
It would work, if "shlibs" worked on OSX, but unfortunately, it depends
on knowing how ELF libraries work.
We've ha
On Feb 13, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Neil Tiffin wrote:
>
>> Now my question. psycopg2 does not care about which postgresql
>> package is installed (to the best of my knowledge). But it needs a -
>> dev to build and any one of t
On Feb 12, 2007, at 11:52 PM, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking at 2 updates that will propagate a bit and
> wanted to hear if anyone has any objections.
>
> * Updating sqlite3 to 3.3.12 - probably not a big deal
>
> * Updating gdal to depend on {postgres,postgis}82
> rather than 80.
