Re: [Fink-devel] xfig crash

2008-05-24 Thread Mike Dyall-Smith
I don't have that issue with xfig 3.2.5, although I do see the splash screen states this is an alpha version. I have a fink installed xfig as part of the arb package. I can open it up and use the 'library' button, which provides access to sets of drawn figures. I am on 10.5.2, and the lat

[Fink-devel] xfig crash

2008-05-24 Thread Sebastian N. Fischmeister
Hello. xfig (3.2.5-1010) generally works well. However, it crashes when I want to open the library (big "Editing" button). Is there a known fix for this? MacOS 10.5.2 xquartz version 2.2.1 I tried selfupdate, rebuild, etc. Thanks, Sebastian ---

Re: [Fink-devel] Let's update gimp2 on pangocairo-branch!

2008-05-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Sun, 11 May 2008 18:19:04 -0400, Alexander Strange wrote: > > Can you make it diffable? :) > To find a happy medium, I renewed my patch and made a new finkinfo. The big differences from the previous patch are: * Delete the -noprint variant. * Divide gimp2-help from gimp2, suggested by Sebasti

Re: [Fink-devel] nox packages, wrongly depend on x11

2008-05-24 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 29/04/2008, Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 28 Apr 2008, at 19:12, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > gnuplot-nox and imagemagick-nox seem to depend on x11 wrongly. > > I attach patches for them in 10.4/unstable. Here are the changes: > > > > nox_gnuplot.d

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependency of imagemagick

2008-05-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hello, About a month ago, I requested SplitOff or --without-rsvg in imagemagick.info. In the present finkinfo, many gnome-related packages must be installed for only a few files, i.e. lib/ImageMagick-%v/modules-Q16/coders/svg.{a,la,so}. It may be frustrating for non-gnome users. How were my sugg

Re: [Fink-devel] nox packages, wrongly depend on x11

2008-05-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hello, imagemagick-nox still depends on openexr, which depends on X11. Please apply attached patches. * 10.4_imagemagick-nox.fix.diff (for 10.4 HEAD) * pango_imagemagick-nox.fix.diff (for 10.4 pangocairo-branch) Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:12:24 +0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote:

[Fink-devel] Can't do any tracker stuff for a bit

2008-05-24 Thread Alexander Hansen
I'm away from home (and I don't have a Mac laptop), and apparently my network there didn't come back online after an outage on Thursday. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual

Re: [Fink-devel] kill fileutils

2008-05-24 Thread Max Horn
Hi folks, I have no problem if my fileutils package gets ditched, I am using coreutils myself. As for the unstable tree: Indeed, the first thing I do when installing fink for somebody somewhere is to enable unstable. Now given my semi- retired status, I don't want to mess up live for my fell

Re: [Fink-devel] kill fileutils

2008-05-24 Thread Matthias Ringwald
On 24.05.2008, at 11:42, James Bunton wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 09:43:55AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: >> At this occasion, I repeat my call to scrap that stinking compost >> heap >> called "stable tree" completely and replace it ASAP, at the same >> time as >> the unstable

Re: [Fink-devel] kill fileutils

2008-05-24 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 24 May 2008, at 09:43, Martin Costabel wrote: > As a conclusion from a long thread on fink-users "More > 'Discoveries' on > pwlib1", I suggest to remove the fileutils package from 10.4/stable. > > It had already been killed once in July 2006 and was reinstated only > because the coreutils pa

Re: [Fink-devel] kill fileutils

2008-05-24 Thread James Bunton
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 09:43:55AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > At this occasion, I repeat my call to scrap that stinking compost heap > called "stable tree" completely and replace it ASAP, at the same time as > the unstable tree, by the pangocairo branch of the unstable tree. Is there any re

[Fink-devel] kill fileutils

2008-05-24 Thread Martin Costabel
As a conclusion from a long thread on fink-users "More 'Discoveries' on pwlib1", I suggest to remove the fileutils package from 10.4/stable. It had already been killed once in July 2006 and was reinstated only because the coreutils package that had caused its removal had itself some problems at