[Fink-devel] individual octave-forge packages

2008-07-01 Thread Jonathan Stickel
I have created info files for a few of the octave-forge packages and have placed them in a new package tracker on Fink sourceforge. I think this is the preferred way to go instead of maintaining the monolithic octave-forge fink package. The info files work for me, but I have done only

[Fink-devel] wine package

2008-07-01 Thread Damian Dimmich
Hi All, The last three wine package submissions have been sitting on the tracker without going into the tree - http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1998212group_id=17203atid=414256 Anyone want to try it out? Also, I've put myself forward as the new maintainer (I hope that

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

2008-07-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 15:53:16 Damian Dimmich wrote: Hi All, The last three wine package submissions have been sitting on the tracker without going into the tree - http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1998212group_id=1 7203atid=414256 Anyone want to try it out? Also,

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

2008-07-01 Thread Kevin Horton
On 1-Jul-08, at 16:22 , Alexander Hansen wrote: On Tuesday 01 July 2008 15:53:16 Damian Dimmich wrote: Hi All, The last three wine package submissions have been sitting on the tracker without going into the tree - http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1998212group_id=1

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

2008-07-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Kevin Horton wrote: [] It builds OK for me on 10.5.3 in maintainer mode with --build-as- nobody. It runs as well as any previous versions I have tried. This appears to be ready to be committed, but I'm no expert. The latter has never stopped me from committing in the past :-) (Not

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

2008-07-01 Thread Kevin Horton
On 1-Jul-08, at 18:38 , Martin Costabel wrote: Kevin Horton wrote: [] It builds OK for me on 10.5.3 in maintainer mode with --build-as- nobody. It runs as well as any previous versions I have tried. This appears to be ready to be committed, but I'm no expert. The latter has never

[Fink-devel] motif-variant of mesa-libglw

2008-07-01 Thread Jack Howarth
Now that the new packaging for lesstif, openmotif3 and openmotif4 has been uplaoded into fink unstable, I would like to change over the existing mesa-libglw packaging to use variants so that libGLw is properly coupled to the motif used to build it. This will require existing packaging to

Re: [Fink-devel] motif-variant of mesa-libglw

2008-07-01 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 02 Jul 2008, at 01:18, Jack Howarth wrote: Now that the new packaging for lesstif, openmotif3 and openmotif4 has been uplaoded into fink unstable, I would like to change over the existing mesa-libglw packaging to use variants so that libGLw is properly coupled to the motif used to