- "Matthias Ringwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI Lonny
>
> the first thing you do in gdb when you hit the problem is a stack
> trace: bt
> It will tell you the call chain. Your problem happens in strol_l which
>
> looks like a standard C lib function. As it should not contain bugs,
HI Lonny
the first thing you do in gdb when you hit the problem is a stack
trace: bt
It will tell you the call chain. Your problem happens in strol_l which
looks like a standard C lib function. As it should not contain bugs,
it was probably called with an invalid pointer. You should find out
> Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
> Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x
> 0x969721e5 in strtol_l ()
> (gdb) list
> 1
> 2 /* png.c - location for general purpose libpng functions
> 3*
> 4* Last changed in libpng 1.2.21 October
My temp 5.2.5 package is not up to the latest 5.2.6 and I haven't touched it in
4 months. It's got postgres83 and it's there for anyone to try or diff
against, but I wouldn't trust it. I defer to the maintainers for a proper
working php5.
-kurt
- Original Message
From: TheSin <[
I have been super busy, but it's just winding down now, I think 2 more
weeks then I want to do a major revamp on apache2 and php5. Just
waiting for the last of my major projects to be complete which is
suppose to be first week of sept so long as we don't run into any
problems of course.
--
No hasty plans here. :-) I wasn't sure just _how_ busy you were, and
figured it was worth discussing here on -devel.
TheSin wrote:
> now now guys lets not get hasty, I've just been busy, if you are going
> to add it, at least up the postgres on it so that when i add all my
> changes that I have
now now guys lets not get hasty, I've just been busy, if you are going
to add it, at least up the postgres on it so that when i add all my
changes that I have been working on the postgres is at least up to
date :D
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing wi
Hey, if this didn't require you to do anything untoward to have it
work, maybe we should add it to Fink. I think the statute of
limitations is up on the prior package.
On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
>
>
> http://vislab-ccom.unh.edu/~schwehr/software/fink/php-5.2.5/
>
> -kur
http://vislab-ccom.unh.edu/~schwehr/software/fink/php-5.2.5/
-kurt
--
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:30:38 +1200
From: Nigel Stanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] php5 build fix
To: Fink Developers
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type:
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:30 AM, Nigel Stanger wrote:
> On 19/8/2008 11:03 AM, Alexander Hansen at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
> thus:
>
>> A newer upstream version would indeed be more ideal. One of our
>> developers has a package out corresponding to a newer version that
>> people have used--but he
On 19/8/2008 11:03 AM, Alexander Hansen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
thus:
> A newer upstream version would indeed be more ideal. One of our
> developers has a package out corresponding to a newer version that
> people have used--but he had to disable some of the functionality to
> get it to build.
11 matches
Mail list logo