Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-16 Thread Robert Wyatt
Alexander Hansen wrote: > > Robert Wyatt wrote: >> Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm >> going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the >> X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it >> shouldn't matter (in which

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Wyatt wrote: > Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm > going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the > X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it > shouldn't ma

[Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-16 Thread Robert Wyatt
Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it shouldn't matter (in which case I would install the alpha). --Robert -

Re: [Fink-devel] problems with Eterm in fink

2009-09-16 Thread monipol
On 16/09/2009, at 16:23, John K. Parejko wrote: > I sent this request to the Eterm package maintainer back in August, > but haven't heard anything, so I thought I'd report it here. > > There seems to be a problem with Fink's build of Eterm. stty is not > getting set up correctly, so "erase" is wro

[Fink-devel] problems with Eterm in fink

2009-09-16 Thread John K . Parejko
Hello, I sent this request to the Eterm package maintainer back in August, but haven't heard anything, so I thought I'd report it here. There seems to be a problem with Fink's build of Eterm. stty is not getting set up correctly, so "erase" is wrong, and "rows" and "columns" are both 0 Th

[Fink-devel] May I commit this fix for blt-x86_64.info ?

2009-09-16 Thread William G. Scott
Alternatively try using the attached patch from the Fedora 12 blt srpm. It looks like a true fix. Cheers. Jack --- src/bltInit.c.orig 2008-03-17 18:42:09.0 -0700 +++ src/bltInit.c 2008-03-17 18:43:05.0 -0700 @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ * Check that the versions

[Fink-devel] bltwish (blt) on 64-bit SL is messed up

2009-09-16 Thread Jack Howarth
Alternatively try using the attached patch from the Fedora 12 blt srpm. It looks like a true fix. Cheers. Jack --- src/bltInit.c.orig 2008-03-17 18:42:09.0 -0700 +++ src/bltInit.c 2008-03-17 18:43:05.0 -0700 @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ * Check that the versions of

[Fink-devel] bltwish (blt) on 64-bit SL is messed up

2009-09-16 Thread Jack Howarth
Sounds like... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456738 which suggests the workaround from... https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2585764&group_id=13179&atid=113179 of invoking the broken scripts with... #!/usr/bin/wish -f package require Expect ...instead of... #!/

[Fink-devel] Fwd: [Fink-users] gtk-doc and uri-pm deprecated

2009-09-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
-- Forwarded message -- From: Eric Lederrey Date: Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:52 AM Subject: [Fink-users] gtk-doc and uri-pm deprecated To: [email protected] Hi, I noticed that gtk-doc and uri-pm packages relies both on files that are no more available on mirrors. I up