-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since the 10.6 upgrade instructions are about to get pushed off the news
page, I've got a draft for a full upgrade document, which will also be
accessible via the navigation bar after some tweaking.
Upgrade Instructions for Mac OS X 10.6
Important Not
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:10:27AM -0800, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> >
> > This is the problem fink now has with its Update* fields. Updating
> > the files that will be copied may fix some things, but may break
> > others.
> >
>
> Maybe
On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> This is the problem fink now has with its Update* fields. Updating
> the files that will be copied may fix some things, but may break
> others.
>
Maybe we should introduce new fields for the new updates? With names
like ModernizeConfig
On 11/09/2009 11:38 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:19:14AM -0600, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2009 03:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>>
On 10.6/64bit, the 'Update' fields could have a renewed interest,
>>>
On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:19:14AM -0600, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>> On 11/09/2009 03:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>
>>> On 10.6/64bit, the 'Update' fields could have a renewed interest,
>>> because many packages have config.guess versions that gu
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:19:14AM -0600, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 11/09/2009 03:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> > On 10.6/64bit, the 'Update' fields could have a renewed interest,
> > because many packages have config.guess versions that guess wrong. In
> > fact, does there even exist a confi
Feedback: works for me
--
Package manager version: 0.29.10
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Mon Nov 9 13:57:05 2009, 10.6,
x86_64
Mac OS X version: 10.6.1
Xcode version: 3.2.1
gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (dot 1)
make version: 3.81
--
Jean-Francois Sygnet
Institut d'Astrop
On 11/09/2009 03:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 10.6/64bit, the 'Update' fields could have a renewed interest,
> because many packages have config.guess versions that guess wrong. In
> fact, does there even exist a config.guess that gives the right answer
> "x84_64-apple-darwin10"? Apple's own
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[]
> Feel free to change it in fink's ltconfig, etc., and the problem should
> be "fixed" with the next fink release, but really I think that the
> 'Update*' fields should be deprecated, in favor of rerunning some
> version of autotools.
It is true that both packages gtk+
