Martin Costabel wrote:
> Alexander Hansen wrote:
> []
>> I was told that the package functioned on 10.6/64-bit. I didn't have
>> time actually to verify that on a clean 10.6 system at that time, but
>> verified that it works on 10.5; I applied an update to maxima concurrently.
>
> There is someth
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
> I was told that the package functioned on 10.6/64-bit. I didn't have
> time actually to verify that on a clean 10.6 system at that time, but
> verified that it works on 10.5; I applied an update to maxima concurrently.
There is something weird going on: I have two bui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/1/10 11:05 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Dr. Wolfram Schroers wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> I have followed the instructions and removed the entries from
>> /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status. There were no files with sbcl in their names in the
>> /sw/var/lib/dpk
Dr. Wolfram Schroers wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I have followed the instructions and removed the entries from
> /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status. There were no files with sbcl in their names in the
> /sw/var/lib/dpkg/info subdirectory. Finally, I ran "fink scanpackages" and
> "sudo apt-get update".
>
> When
That's odd. As far as I can tell Martin Costabel's instructions should
have made dpkg forget about sbcl altogether.
Could you possibly post your /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status file to some Web
or FTP server so that we are able to get it? If that's not possible,
send it to my e-mail address (do not
