Hi again,
as you may have noticed, I checked in new versions of libao2 and libao4 (and
took over maintainership from Ben), as well as libogg, libvorbis0 and
vorbis-tools.
If this causes any failures anywhere (in particular 10.4 & 10.5 machines,
powerpc or intel, and also 64bit 10.6 machines),
Yes, I did like that previously. But nieder suggested to use JarFiles field.
I'll patch the script then.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 3/29/10 8:12 AM, Hariharan B wrote:
> > But ExTeX startup script relies on thes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/29/10 8:12 AM, Hariharan B wrote:
> But ExTeX startup script relies on these two environment variables. Can
> you please suggest an alternative?
Yes, patch the script to find the jars where you install them.
If all it requires is it's own java j
> If you have tools that require a non-standard JAVA_HOME or CLASSPATH,
> you should wrap them with a script included in your package
But ExTeX startup script relies on these two environment variables. Can you
please suggest an alternative?
There is a parameter inside startup script called
LIBDI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/29/10 5:04 AM, Hariharan B wrote:
> RuntimeVars: <<
> JAVA_HOME=/usr
> CLASSPATH=%p/share/java
> <<
Do not set either of these environment variables in an info file. /usr
is *still* not a valid JAVA_HOME, and classpath is automatically created
b
My apologies, its my mistake.
I should have used : instead of =.
--
Regards,
Hariharan B
International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for
Hi,
First time when I use RuntimeVars, it worked perfectly. But after removing
extex and rebuilding it, I got this line in the console. As a result,
JAVA_HOME was not set.
RuntimeVars: <<
JAVA_HOME=/usr
CLASSPATH=%p/share/java
<<
WARNING: Unable to parse the line "JAVA_HOME=/usr" at line 1 of ru
Ah, Thank you sir.
As mentioned in developer website, I will include LGPL in the info file.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 at 12:24pm +0530, Hariharan B wrote:
>
> Is GNU GPL v2 called LGPL? If so, I will include License as LGPL in the
>> info
>>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 at 12:24pm +0530, Hariharan B wrote:
> Is GNU GPL v2 called LGPL? If so, I will include License as LGPL in the info
> file.
Obviously GPL and LGPL differ: "The GNU Lesser General Public License
(LGPL) is a modified, more permissive, version of the GPL, originally
intended fo
