Hanspeter,
Go right ahead. There's no sane reason anyone would still be using openvrml as
opposed to openvrml016. Even openvrml016 is getting old. I'll need to look at
porting the latest version sometime.
Regards,
Phil.
On 28/07/2010, at 10:26 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
The package
On Thu, July 29, 2010 6:06 am, Philip Lamb wrote:
Hanspeter,
Go right ahead. There's no sane reason anyone would still be using
openvrml as opposed to openvrml016. Even openvrml016 is getting old. I'll
need to look at porting the latest version sometime.
Regards,
Phil.
I've gone ahead
