On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 09:15:32AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> On 4/8/11 9:51 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>I've uploaded a new llvm-clang package to replace the existing llvm
>> package and an updated llvm-gcc42 package.
>
> I don't see how this could work; old llvm-gcc42 depends on "llvm" and
On 4/8/11 9:51 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>I've uploaded a new llvm-clang package to replace the existing llvm
> package and an updated llvm-gcc42 package.
I don't see how this could work; old llvm-gcc42 depends on "llvm" and
"llvm-shlibs" (with an = no less), so you can't have llvm-clang
Confl
