On 8/20/14, 4:11 PM, Jacques Bloch wrote:
> After creating the symboling link from /sw/fink/10.10 to /sw/fink/10.9
> the ./inject.pl runs with less error messages, but is still not
> successful. It finishes with:
> /
> /
> //sw/bin/fink install fink-0.37.99.git-20140820.2302
> Scanning package desc
After creating the symboling link from /sw/fink/10.10 to /sw/fink/10.9 the
./inject.pl runs with less error messages, but is still not successful. It
finishes with:
/sw/bin/fink install fink-0.37.99.git-20140820.2302
Scanning package description files..
Information about 10010 packages r
On 8/20/14, 6:27 AM, Jacques Bloch wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Not sure if I should send this to you or on some mailing list. I did as
> you suggested: downloaded the development branch at halfdome, modified
> the Engine.pm file and ran inject.pl with the following unsuccessful ouput:
>
> /> sudo ./
Hi Alexander,
Not sure if I should send this to you or on some mailing list. I did as you
suggested: downloaded the development branch at halfdome, modified the
Engine.pm file and ran inject.pl with the following unsuccessful ouput:
> sudo ./inject.pl
Creating fink tarball...
tar -cf /sw/src/fi
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:44:00 +0200, Max Horn wrote:
Hi,
>
> On 19.08.2014, at 19:57, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:47:58 +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> cp: /sw/share/info/dir.bak: Permission denied
> >> >> I think this is caused by the install-info tool and the fact
Hi,
On 19.08.2014, at 19:57, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:47:58 +0200, Max Horn wrote:
[...]
>> cp: /sw/share/info/dir.bak: Permission denied
>>
>> I think this is caused by the install-info tool and the fact that the
>> affected packages (e.g. grep) use the "InfoDocs" fiel
correct as it hasn’t gotten approval form the core team. Though I still stand
by that it should be allowed, it would help solve lots of grief.
---
TS
http://www.southofheaven.org/
Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
On Aug 20, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> So I a
I have always said and stand by that BDO packages should be allowed to have a
Dep on other BDO packages.
So -dev packages can dep on other -dev packages. It’s be a slight bending of
the rule but still keep it close to the original and it would solve lots of
issues. I have brought this up a fe
On 2014 Aug 17, at 12:18 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
wrote:
> I've just published the results of a buildworld run on a 10.9 system.
Mr. Neiderstrasser, thanks for the test. However, i'm confused as to
what is expected of me on this. My package [freeciv] is marked as
"./failures/pro
So I assume that means the desired behavior of BDO packages having a Dep on
other BDO packages currently won't pass validation in fink, right?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:25 AM, TheSin wrote:
> I have always said and stand by that BDO packages should be allowed to
> have a Dep on other BDO packa
The buildworld has also exposed a major flaw in the r-base* packaging. The
builds logs for…
http://www.snaggledworks.com/fink/buildworld/2014-07-24/logs/cran-slam-r30.log
and
http://www.snaggledworks.com/fink/buildworld/2014-07-24/logs/cran-rjava-r31.log
show the missing dependencies on gcc49-c
>http://www.snaggledworks.com/fink/buildworld/2014-07-24/out/filters.xml
>
> but this gives me a 404 error.
That's fixed now.
> In any case, I fixed some of the issues you pointed out (in sdl2,
> fflas-ffpack, mc, the-silver-searcher) but now am mostly left with
> "failures/project/insuffic
12 matches
Mail list logo
