On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging
> that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib
> validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or
> on older darwin
Hi all,
Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging
that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib
validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or
on older darwin @executable_path or @loader_path). This was a decision b
