On 11/8/14, 3:33 PM, David Fang wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote:
>>> Alex,
>>>
>>> > On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote:
>>> > > > Hi all,
>>> > > Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's
>>> packagin
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote:
>> Alex,
>>
>> > On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > > Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging
>> > > that bootstraps (much like its predec
On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote:
> Alex,
>
>> On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging
>>> that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib
>>> validation because the install_nam
Alex,
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging
>> that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib
>> validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or
>> on ol
On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging
> that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib
> validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or
> on older darwin
