> On Oct 3, 2015, at 11:28, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
> mailto:f...@snaggledworks.com>> wrote:
> If I'm reading fink-virtual-packages correctly, 1.6 was the last version
> provided by Apple, and 1.7+ must be gotten from Oracle. Is tha
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser <
f...@snaggledworks.com> wrote:
> If I'm reading fink-virtual-packages correctly, 1.6 was the last version
> provided by Apple, and 1.7+ must be gotten from Oracle. Is that correct?
> When Martin's fix gets released, would best practices
If I'm reading fink-virtual-packages correctly, 1.6 was the last version
provided by Apple, and 1.7+ must be gotten from Oracle. Is that correct?
When Martin's fix gets released, would best practices be to keep
pointing packages to system-java16 since its a system tool, or would it
be preferr
> On Oct 3, 2015, at 08:11, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> (See my response the message "Can't build virtuoso under El Capitan" on
> fink-beginners)
>
> If one installs Apple's JavaForOSX2015-001 package on OSX 10.11, it
> places the JavaVirtualMachines directory into /Library/Java and not into
(See my response the message "Can't build virtuoso under El Capitan" on
fink-beginners)
If one installs Apple's JavaForOSX2015-001 package on OSX 10.11, it
places the JavaVirtualMachines directory into /Library/Java and not into
/System/Library/Java as it did on previous systems (for the same p
