Re: [Fink-devel] fink packages dependent on motif officially broken

Jack, Thanks for all your work. I'm finally back home today after most of the last two months on the road, and had time to test tracker item 4779, for xephem. I've tested this with fink -m on macOS 10.12, and ran it with XQuartz 2.7.9 and 2.7.10, with no issues. I tried to commit it, but I'm

Re: [Fink-devel] proposed libxt and libxt-flat issues

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Daniel, > The proposed libxt/libxt-flat packaging in your experimental, which > places both in %p rather than buried subdirectories, would seem to require > either... > > every single package building against

[Fink-devel] proposed libxt and libxt-flat issues

Daniel, The proposed libxt/libxt-flat packaging in your experimental, which places both in %p rather than buried subdirectories, would seem to require either... every single package building against Xquartz in fink have a BuildDepends on libxt and a Depends on libxt-shlibs added (which is a